US counting on Pakistan’s support, says McCain

US senator calls for ‘a strategy to win’ the Afghan war


Afp July 05, 2017
US senator calls for ‘a strategy to win’ the Afghan war. PHOTO: REUTERS

KABUL: US Senator John McCain visited Kabul on Tuesday and said that Washington was counting on Islamabad’s support to eliminate militancy and in particular the Haqqani network, responsible for numerous attacks on Afghan territory.

The relationship between the US and Pakistan has been strained at times, with some in Washington believing Islamabad has not done enough to bring its influence to bear to persuade the Afghan Taliban to renounce violence.

John McCain-led US team visits South Waziristan, praises Pak Army's efforts

McCain’s statement came one day after he and a bi-partisan Senate delegation visited Islamabad, where Pakistani officials said he reinforced the country’s essential role in regional stability.

“We made it very clear that we expect they (Pakistan) will cooperate with us, particularly against the Haqqani network and against terrorist organisations,” said McCain, chairman of the US Senate Armed Services Committee, in Kabul.

“If they don’t change their behaviour maybe we should change our behaviour towards Pakistan as a nation,” he insisted.

Pakistan has received billions in US aid since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

The Taliban-affiliated Haqqani network, based in the border areas between the two countries, has long been thought to have ties to Pakistan’s shadowy military establishment.

Led by Sirajuddin Haqqani, who is also the Taliban’s deputy leader, they have carried out numerous operations deep in the heart of Kabul, and have been blamed by Afghanistan for a devastating truck bombing which killed more than 150 people in the capital in May.

The Senate visit to Islamabad and Kabul comes as the US is gearing up to send more troops to Afghanistan to support Afghan forces straining to beat back the resurgent Taliban.

McCain called for more than just troops, however, urging ‘a strategy to win’ the war which has dragged on for nearly 16 years and which even US generals concede is at a ‘stalemate’.

“The strongest nation on earth in this world should be able to win this conflict,” he said, calling for diplomatic efforts alongside a military push.

Pak-US security cooperation key to regional security: COAS

The US currently has 8,400 troops deployed under the NATO banner, and is thought to be mulling sending up to 4,000 more.

Pentagon chief Jim Mattis has stressed his new approach, due to be presented to US President Donald Trump by mid-July, will have a broader “regional” emphasis, with no set timetable.

Trump has remained remarkably taciturn on Afghanistan, but this month gave Mattis authority to set troop numbers at whatever level he saw fit.

Nato, whose Operation Resolute Support numbers some 13,500 including the Americans, also promised last week to increase its presence in Afghanistan.

Recent Taliban gains have shaken confidence in Afghanistan’s future and talk of sending NATO troops in has stoked fears the alliance could get sucked back into an unwinnable war.

But Mattis refused recently to ‘put timelines’ on the conflict.

“The bottom line is that NATO has made a commitment to Afghanistan for freedom from fear and terror... You can’t let this be undone,” he said in Brussels last week.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 5th, 2017.

COMMENTS (4)

numbersnumbers | 6 years ago | Reply Second try! For insight into the Americans as to what is coming, all search for June 2017 Pentagon Report "Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan"!
Mekal Faruki | 6 years ago | Reply The Afghan War is an American problem with the Afghans, nothing to do with Pakistan. American officials (Cheney and Armitage) are to blame for threatening the Afghans which caused the problem. McCain and Graham are using the same failed tactics of making threats which wont get any results. America is going to great pains to avoid admitting defeat by the Afghans. American false pride.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ