Will Libya be partitioned?

On ground, the rebels, have not been able to make any progress towards recapturing the cities that they lost


Najmuddin A Shaikh April 07, 2011

The end of the misery that the Libyan people are suffering does not appear to be in sight. So far, some 439,000 people have fled Libya and roughly 6,000 people are fleeing the country every day.

On the ground, the rebels, or revolutionaries, have not been able to make any progress towards recapturing the cities that they lost to Qaddafi’s forces, despite the continuing air strikes by the coalition forces under Nato command. Nato fact sheets maintain that their air attacks against Qaddafi forces, found to be attacking civilians, are continuing, and that 30 per cent of the regime’s ground forces have been destroyed. Rebel leaders, however, say that since the Americans handed over to Nato, “there’s a delay in reacting and lack of response to what’s going on the ground”. Admittedly, some of the air operations were delayed by weather conditions and, more recently, Nato officials have claimed that the efficacy of the Nato effort has been reduced because the Qaddafi forces have used civilians as cover. The net effect has been reduced rebel morale.

The Americans have stood down and this has meant that their fearsome C-130s, with mounted machine guns for use against infantry and A-10 aircraft, specifically designed to provide the precise firepower to attack enemy tanks even when they are close to civilian targets, is no longer available. The American position is, of course, determined by US President Obama’s strongly held belief that the Libyan operation must be seen as an international effort to enforce UNSC resolutions 1970 and 1973, and not an America dominated effort. Given the distrust of America and America’s intentions that pervades the Middle East and the Muslim world, this makes sense.

It is, however, the American envoy, now in Benghazi, whose assessment of the Transitional National Council, and other opposition groups, will ultimately determine whether the Americans, and by extension Nato, will decide to provide training and weapons to the rebel forces, and whether the $32 billion in Libyan funds, currently frozen by the Americans, can be made available to this council to meet both its humanitarian and military needs. Will this come about and, if it does, will it help bring an end to the raging conflict?

The Libyan military forces are not really a military at all. They are, in the words of an American correspondent, less an organised force than the martial manifestation of a popular uprising. As if this were not bad enough, the Transitional National Council appointed head of the army, Younes, is at loggerheads with Hatfar, a veteran soldier who returned to Libya after 25 years in the US and is now regarded, by himself and many others, as the rightful head of the ragtag motley army.

The resources available to the rebels are also limited. The rebel controlled oil field at Misla, which could produce 100,000 barrels a day, has been put out of commission, the rebels say, by Qaddafi forces, while Qaddafi’s deputy foreign minister asserts that the oil field was damaged by British warplanes intent on destroying Libya’s assets. Be that as it may, the rebels currently say that they will export some one million barrels that they have in storage, but beyond that they do not believe they can rely on oil exports that the Qataris have agreed to market. This suggests that it will be many months before the Benghazi-based council will be able to secure control over the 75 per cent of Libya’s oil resources that lie in the east of the country.

It is clear, therefore, that the rebels have neither the military nor the economic strength to overcome Qaddafi, who has at his disposal a trained, albeit depleted, military force and hundreds of millions of dollars in cash and gold bullion valued at more than $6 billion.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 8th, 2011.

COMMENTS (8)

Khalid Rahim | 13 years ago | Reply Uncle Sam has successfully kept Koreans apart. Thanks to the courage of late Ho Chi Minh and General Giap may he live to 100 years, Uncle Sam failed to divide the Vietnamese. But he did do away with Yugoslavia,this was followed by splitting the Czechs and Slovaks. In Iraq the neocons through their doctrine of the New World Order had plans to divide Iraq into Independent Kurdistan and Iraq. Turkey raised hue and cry along with Syria and Iran as all three have territories with Kurd majority. Next they thought of creating new states from Iran Afghanistan and Pakistan which is under process through their War against Terror and with help of proteges. Sudan has already been split into North and South soon Darfur will also be separated. Most probably the target is to split Libya into four new states depending how it works out with the tribes.Each of the new State will maintain a NATO base mandatory or get economically screwed. I wonder how late FDR is following these events wherever he may be?
John | 13 years ago | Reply @Saad Durrani: Not intentionally. Compare and contrast in an analysis are unavoidable. No ill thought intended. Every nation has there internal conflict. But it does not mean partition is coming and is a solution to conflict. All conflicts of the past and of the present in recorded history are based on tribal identity, ( same or different language does not matter). Nations are formed based on tribal identity or provinces are formed based on tribal identify and come together as a federated state. Religion has never been and will never be an unifying force in forming and maintaining a nation. Unfortunately religion, language, and ethnicity has to be compared in defining the term Identity. Now let us look at known partitions of recent times: Sudan, Kosovo, USSR, Palestine, India. Let us look at the stable federations: UK, USA, Canada,India, China, Germany, and in modern times EU. The roots and solutions are essentially based on tribal identity. Provinces based on tribal identity and certain degree of autonomy form a stable Nation. This federation takes time. And there will be conflicts between them. Libya is in this conflict phase which is amplified by single individual cult identity. Essentially the tribes want a new leader in Libya. In olden days they beheaded the leader, in swords or guillotine in battle fields, streets of paris, or in tower of London. Now they send them to exile, to live in London, Paris, USA, or Saudi Arabia either through protests of minor internal unrest or through ballot boxes. A leader who senses this becomes a national hero. Otherwise, he/she becomes a dictator. ( pls ignore type errors)
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ