Targeting the Maulana
JUI Chief Fazlur Rehman is known to have been on the TTP hit list for some time now.
There have been, within 24 hours, two suicide attempts on the life of JUI-F Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman. In Swabi, a suicide bomber on a motorbike blew himself up as the convoy passed nearby, killing 10 people. Another 13 perished in Charsadda a day later, in another suicide attack. Fazl, who remains defiant, insisting his party will not cave in to the pressure, is quite evidently a wanted man.
It is believed that members of the Tehreek-i-Taliban (TTP) Pakistan oppose his involvement in parliamentary politics; his political alliances and compromises; and his recent suggestion that a modification in blasphemy laws is possible. Moreover, it is possible that the TTP’s young leadership sees him as someone who is willing to compromise — a consummate politician who wants to work within the system, whereas the TTP want the system to be replaced with their own version of Islam.
Fazl is known to have been on the TTP hit list for some time now. The division of the Taliban into factions also complicates matters, with conjecture that the JUI-F leader may have angered some of the splinter groups.
The maulana has been fortunate to survive. Security forces in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP) have reportedly advised him not to address any rallies. This cutting off of politicians from people is precisely what the extremists seek. Such a divorce weakens mainstream forces and opens up a wider space for militants to operate freely. It also seems apparent that they are able to operate at will. KP authorities say there has been no security lapse, but we wonder why it is still proving impossible to collect adequate information from the intelligence networks and determine who is planning attacks. We also need to see complete political unity. The reports that some rival JUI factions have blamed the attacks on Fazl are disturbing. There can be many disagreements over ideology and opinion. But whatever these are, political parties need to join together, unequivocally condemning the violence, no matter against whom it is directed or what the motives may be.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 2nd, 2011.
It is believed that members of the Tehreek-i-Taliban (TTP) Pakistan oppose his involvement in parliamentary politics; his political alliances and compromises; and his recent suggestion that a modification in blasphemy laws is possible. Moreover, it is possible that the TTP’s young leadership sees him as someone who is willing to compromise — a consummate politician who wants to work within the system, whereas the TTP want the system to be replaced with their own version of Islam.
Fazl is known to have been on the TTP hit list for some time now. The division of the Taliban into factions also complicates matters, with conjecture that the JUI-F leader may have angered some of the splinter groups.
The maulana has been fortunate to survive. Security forces in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP) have reportedly advised him not to address any rallies. This cutting off of politicians from people is precisely what the extremists seek. Such a divorce weakens mainstream forces and opens up a wider space for militants to operate freely. It also seems apparent that they are able to operate at will. KP authorities say there has been no security lapse, but we wonder why it is still proving impossible to collect adequate information from the intelligence networks and determine who is planning attacks. We also need to see complete political unity. The reports that some rival JUI factions have blamed the attacks on Fazl are disturbing. There can be many disagreements over ideology and opinion. But whatever these are, political parties need to join together, unequivocally condemning the violence, no matter against whom it is directed or what the motives may be.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 2nd, 2011.