Nuclear roulette

A mutually agreed nuclear disarmament treaty between India and Pakistan has never been on the cards


Editorial April 07, 2017
PHOTO: ISPR

A mutually agreed nuclear disarmament treaty between India and Pakistan has never been on the cards and is never likely to be. Both maintain a nuclear arsenal and both have the capacity to deliver nuclear weapons anywhere within the territory of the other. Mutually assured destruction (MAD) is indeed assured. Neither state presents a nuclear threat face to any other enemy. Given the oscillating volatility of both states it is unsurprising that the nuclear cards get a periodic shuffle, and India under Modi has moved into an altogether more martial phase with threat levels, nuclear and conventional, rising accordingly. Analysts and observers are of a uniform opinion — the place a nuclear exchange is most likely to happen accidentally, as in a reactive event rather than a first-strike assault — is between India and Pakistan, and India is likely in that event to be the state that pushes the button first.

Reports are in circulation that India may consider revising its no first strike policy, allowing its ‘nuclear establishment’ to conduct pre-emptive strikes against Pakistan in the event of a war. The environment of managed instability along the Line of Control and the Working Boundary has heated up in the last year. In addition to cross-border shelling there have been movements of armour and heavy artillery on both sides. India has claimed to have raided into Pakistan — without providing substantive evidence of such — and any shift in the position regarding nuclear doctrines is going to do nothing for strategic restraint in the region.

Why this latest upping of the ante is irresponsible and dangerous is that it adds another layer of uncertainty. For all the sabre-rattling by India there is little real possibility of the pot boiling over, and now would be an opportune time if ever there was one to explore moderate and peaceful outcomes, create confidence-building measures, propose a halt to the arrests of each other’s innocent but wandering fisherpeople — and there seems little doubt that Pakistan would be willing to consider all of that as part of a composite dialogue, but no. Instead India plays the pre-emptive strike card and raises further human rights concerns in Kashmir. Let us be blunt. Act your age, India. Grow up. And stop throwing your toys around the (nuclear) playpen.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 8th, 2017.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (3)

Maniha | 7 years ago | Reply “Let us be blunt. Act your age, India. Grow up. And stop throwing your toys around the (nuclear) playpen.” India is maintaining its position as a state from more than half of the century but it still lacks the maturity it needs to act as a responsible nuclear weapon state. Is there any limit or end in lethal technologies? There is never ending advancement in nuclear and India is inclined to trigger up an arms race in the region which is of no use. India should get rid of its own security dilemma and try to put down the lens of hegemonic spectacles.
Vectra | 7 years ago | Reply I myself is a supporter of total global nuclear disarmament.BTW India itself would never like to change its own NFU doctrine which it itself has carted but once its people comes under nuclear attack every thing will change forever even if that attack is tactical nuclear.Here people means both civilians and military personnels. For India conventional war was always an acceptable threshold as long as nuclear don't comes in.If an adversary have conventional disparity or shortage as compared to India then it should buy more conventional weapons if it can afford depending on its own willingness and economy.That's the only option,off course that will depend on great amount on affordability. So in my opinion if Pakistan wants to fight India then better fight conventional and how Pakistan can fight that Pakistan has to think and avoid nuclear,tactical and strategic both because India will go wild if tactical nuke was imposed in it let alone strategic.So think and if possible adopt NFU as well like India and China have.This will solve problem to a large extent
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ