US court rejects plea seeking immediate reinstatement of Trump travel ban

Trump administration lodged the request against a lower court order temporarily suspending the travel ban


Afp February 05, 2017
US President Donald Trump: PHOTO: REUTERS

LOS ANGELES: A US federal appeals court early Sunday rejected a request by the Department of Justice to immediately reinstate President Donald Trump's travel ban.

Trump's administration had lodged the request with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of an appeal against a lower court order temporarily suspending the travel ban on citizens from seven mainly Muslim countries.

US revoked 60,000 visas after Trump order

For now, the travel ban suspension remains in place. Both the State and Homeland Security Departments said Saturday they were resuming normal practices concerning travelers from the affected countries.

Judge William Canby, Jr in Phoenix and Judge Michelle Friedland in San Francisco did not give a reason for their denial in a two-paragraph ruling.

Trump: US will win appeal of judge's travel ban order

However, they told the states of Washington and Minnesota, which had filed the original suit against Trump's travel ban, to provide documents detailing their opposition to the government's appeal by 11:59 pm Sunday.

The Department of Justice was given a deadline of 3pm Monday to supply more documents supporting its position.

Expressing his anger, President Trump criticised the judiciary, saying it would open up the country to "potential terrorists".

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/828042506851934209

COMMENTS (1)

curious2 | 4 years ago | Reply No surprise here. Fulfilling a campaign promise doesn't mean that there was a legitimate national emergency requiring immediate attention. The bigger problem facing Trump is that he has to appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - the most liberal of the Appeal Courts. The 9th Circuit is famous for making odd ball liberal rulings which are often overturned by the Supreme Court ... which is where this issue is likely to end up. . Trump would have been smarter had he waiting until his Attorney General nominee was confirmed before trying to implement this controversial law. Unfortunately the term "smarter" and Trump don't go hand in hand.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read