Nawaz trying to escape Panamagate case, says Imran

PTI chief says the prime minister is bound to be accountable to the nation


News Desk January 13, 2017
PTI chairman Imran Khan. PHOTO: REUTERS

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan on Friday claimed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was trying to escape the Panamagate case in the Supreme Court (SC) as he did not possess any evidence to prove himself innocent.



Addressing the media after the proceedings of the Panamagate scandal, the PTI chief said PM Nawaz was accountable to the nation. “Every leader is accountable to the people in democracy,” Imran said.

PTI counsel concludes arguments in Panamagate case

Taking a jibe at the premier, Imran said Nawaz was not even aware of the fact that his children became billionaires. “They have accepted the ownership of the London apartments and now it’s their duty to provide their money trail in the court,” he said.



The cricketer-turned-politician went on to say that the ruling party had challenged PTI to take them to court, however, they were now hiding behind technical reasons. “Today they have shown that they have no evidence of any business money trails and are hiding behind technicalities that Article 62 and 63 do not apply to the prime minister,” he said.





Imran said the main argument of the PM’s counsel was “It is difficult to find Sadiq and Amin (Righteous and trustworthy) people in the country.”

COMMENTS (3)

Gaz | 7 years ago | Reply @Blithe: try to stay with the subject. The subject is Panama papers and the case and corruption. What Imran Khan has or has not done in his personal life has nothing to do with the case. If you cannnot find anything intelligent to contribute then leave the debating to others.
Blithe | 7 years ago | Reply A person who denies his own "love child" daughter the recognition she deserves, is talking about article 62 and 63? The irony!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ