India halts funding for its Olympic association
IOA’s move to honour two controversial administrators infuriated the government
NEW DELHI:
The Indian Olympic Association's (IOA) move to honour two controversial administrators has infuriated the government with the sports ministry cutting off funding and the use of other facilities extended to the body.
The IOA named its former presidents Suresh Kalmadi and Abhay Singh Chautala as life presidents on Tuesday, a decision that has been heavily criticised after both are facing allegations of corruption.
Kalmadi spent nine months in jail after the allegations, stemming from the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi. He was released pending an appeal to Delhi High Court and has steadfastedly denied any wrongdoing.
More than 1,000 Russian athletes in 'institutionalised' doping: McLaren
Chautala is also facing unrelated corruption charges in an ongoing court case. He has also denied the allegations.
"IOA will cease to enjoy the privileges and prerogatives bestowed on it by the government as the National Olympic Committee (NOC)," said the Indian sports ministry in a statement. "All government assistance, financial or otherwise, to IOA will also be stopped."
Kalmadi has declined the post until his case has been heard, while Chautala, who was initially adamant to stay on in the patron's role, has hinted at stepping down.
The IOA sought time until January 15 to reply to sports ministry notice, citing its president Narayana Ramachandran was abroad, but the ministry dismissed it as a "ploy" to buy time.
Three London Olympics gold medallists disqualified for doping
"Although the government has utmost respect for the Olympic Charter and is committed to protecting the autonomy of sports, it cannot remain a mute spectator to blatant violation of principles of ethic and good governance by IOA," said the ministry.
Former shooter Abhinav Bindra, India's first individual Olympic gold medallist, welcomed the suspension of the IOA, which is perceived in cricket-mad India as a clumsy organisation relying mostly on government largesse and run by politicians who are opposed to new faces and fresh ideas.
The Indian Olympic Association's (IOA) move to honour two controversial administrators has infuriated the government with the sports ministry cutting off funding and the use of other facilities extended to the body.
The IOA named its former presidents Suresh Kalmadi and Abhay Singh Chautala as life presidents on Tuesday, a decision that has been heavily criticised after both are facing allegations of corruption.
Kalmadi spent nine months in jail after the allegations, stemming from the 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi. He was released pending an appeal to Delhi High Court and has steadfastedly denied any wrongdoing.
More than 1,000 Russian athletes in 'institutionalised' doping: McLaren
Chautala is also facing unrelated corruption charges in an ongoing court case. He has also denied the allegations.
"IOA will cease to enjoy the privileges and prerogatives bestowed on it by the government as the National Olympic Committee (NOC)," said the Indian sports ministry in a statement. "All government assistance, financial or otherwise, to IOA will also be stopped."
Kalmadi has declined the post until his case has been heard, while Chautala, who was initially adamant to stay on in the patron's role, has hinted at stepping down.
The IOA sought time until January 15 to reply to sports ministry notice, citing its president Narayana Ramachandran was abroad, but the ministry dismissed it as a "ploy" to buy time.
Three London Olympics gold medallists disqualified for doping
"Although the government has utmost respect for the Olympic Charter and is committed to protecting the autonomy of sports, it cannot remain a mute spectator to blatant violation of principles of ethic and good governance by IOA," said the ministry.
Former shooter Abhinav Bindra, India's first individual Olympic gold medallist, welcomed the suspension of the IOA, which is perceived in cricket-mad India as a clumsy organisation relying mostly on government largesse and run by politicians who are opposed to new faces and fresh ideas.