No pardon for Qandeel’s murder, says father
"Waseem thought he would be imprisoned for just “two to three months and then after he will be free," says Mai
Lawyers told AFP the wording of the legislation, aimed at mandating a life sentence for honour killings, still leaves too much up to a judge’s discretion. PHOTO: FACEBOOK
ISLAMABAD:
Days after parliament adopted legislation toughening up penalties for honour killings, the father of slain social media starlet Qandeel Baloch ruled out the possibility of pardoning his son for the high-profile murder.
Qandeel’s murder sparked an outcry in Pakistan, hastening lawmakers to move an anti-honour killing bill through parliament.
Qandeel Baloch murder: Pardoning of killers impossible as state becomes complainant
Last week, the government led by PML-N passed fresh piece of legislation aimed at closing loopholes which previously allowed killers to walk free.
“There is no pardon from our side,” Baloch’s father Muhammad Azeem told AFP, calling for his son and the three men accused with him to be punished “at the earliest. They should get life imprisonment or death -- I will feel happy”.
He and his wife, Baloch’s mother Anwar Mai, said they had been unaware of the change in the law, which came three months after their daughter’s death sparked revulsion in the country and abroad.
Their son, Mai said, had not understood the repercussions the murder would have. The death of Baloch reignited polarising calls for action after her brother admitted killing her.
His mother said this weekend that he had thought his parents would become the only complainants in the case, which under previous legislation would have allowed him to escape punishment if his family had forgiven him.
Waseem thought he would be imprisoned for just “two to three months and then after he will be free, he was not aware that this would become a high-profile case”, Mai told AFP.
Killer says instigated by Qandeel’s selfies with cleric
Lawyers told AFP the wording of the legislation, aimed at mandating a life sentence for honour killings, still leaves too much up to a judge’s discretion.
“There is a danger that it can be interpreted to mean that this only applies in cases when there is a disagreement over pardon of the offencer,” said criminal law professor Abira Ashfaq.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 12th, 2016.
Days after parliament adopted legislation toughening up penalties for honour killings, the father of slain social media starlet Qandeel Baloch ruled out the possibility of pardoning his son for the high-profile murder.
Qandeel’s murder sparked an outcry in Pakistan, hastening lawmakers to move an anti-honour killing bill through parliament.
Qandeel Baloch murder: Pardoning of killers impossible as state becomes complainant
Last week, the government led by PML-N passed fresh piece of legislation aimed at closing loopholes which previously allowed killers to walk free.
“There is no pardon from our side,” Baloch’s father Muhammad Azeem told AFP, calling for his son and the three men accused with him to be punished “at the earliest. They should get life imprisonment or death -- I will feel happy”.
He and his wife, Baloch’s mother Anwar Mai, said they had been unaware of the change in the law, which came three months after their daughter’s death sparked revulsion in the country and abroad.
Their son, Mai said, had not understood the repercussions the murder would have. The death of Baloch reignited polarising calls for action after her brother admitted killing her.
His mother said this weekend that he had thought his parents would become the only complainants in the case, which under previous legislation would have allowed him to escape punishment if his family had forgiven him.
Waseem thought he would be imprisoned for just “two to three months and then after he will be free, he was not aware that this would become a high-profile case”, Mai told AFP.
Killer says instigated by Qandeel’s selfies with cleric
Lawyers told AFP the wording of the legislation, aimed at mandating a life sentence for honour killings, still leaves too much up to a judge’s discretion.
“There is a danger that it can be interpreted to mean that this only applies in cases when there is a disagreement over pardon of the offencer,” said criminal law professor Abira Ashfaq.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 12th, 2016.