The fruits of democracy
After two to three peaceful political dispensations, people will start reaping the benefits of democracy
The writer is a public policy analyst and works with Sustainable Development Policy Institute. He tweets at @taimur__
Serious charges over corruption and abuse of power, a difficult political situation, ban on major media outlets, a growing conflict on hosting more than two million Syrian refugees and a deteriorating law and order situation as a result of terrorist attacks by Islamic State (IS) -- this was the situation faced by the Turkish government led by Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s AKP before the failed military coup attempt. The coup might just have been successful had the Turkish people not come out on the streets against their own military and defended their democracy. Again on August 7, more than a million people attended a pro-democracy rally in Istanbul in response to the failed coup attempt, which shows their resolve for protecting democracy.
I won't go into the reasons behind the abortive military coup and won’t explore Erdogan's controversial ruling style. But we need to ask the question: why did the Turkish people take to the streets in the middle of the night on a single call of their elected president to defend democracy? Irrespective of differences over his ruling style and some serious allegations by his opponents, the fact remains that Erdogan is still the most popular, influential and charismatic leader in Turkey. How did he achieve this positon?
Since the 1960s, Turkey has witnessed four military coups, long-term political instability, economic downturn, rising poverty, and violent clashes between left and right wing groups, which claimed thousands of lives.
After this abortive military coup in Turkey, a debate raged in Pakistan over what would the reaction of Pakistanis be if democracy in the country was ever under threat. This is a difficult question to answer and at best we can only answer with a 'don't know'. However, given the state of governance in Turkey as narrated above, the situation in Pakistan in comparison is not that satisfactory. There is serious tension between the ruling PML-N and the opposition over the Panama affair. Public service delivery is in a poor state. There is a rise in disparities, with 38.8 per cent of Pakistanis still living in multidimensional poverty (which takes into account indicators pertaining to health, education and living standards), unemployment is also on the rise, more than 24 million children are out of school, the energy crisis is yet to be resolved, and except for China, our relations with our neighbours are getting worse by the day. These facts show the dismal performance of the government on all fronts. In such a scenario, it won't be a surprise if people start losing their trust in politicians and the system. However, despite the shortcomings in governance, the Nawaz government has a few success stories to its name too. There has been some improvement in the law and order situation in the country, terrorism is not as rampant as it was before Operation Zarb-e-Azb, and some economic indicators paint a positive picture of the economy owing to increase in trust of investors in the Pakistan Stock Exchange.
Based on the above facts, it is difficult to predict what the reaction of the Pakistani people will be in case democracy is ever under threat in the country. I would say that the challenge for the government and the political class is to gain the people's trust and win their hearts. Only then will people defend and fight to preserve democracy wholeheartedly and there will be no unconstitutional threats. Failing in gaining people's trust may lead to disastrous consequences. How can the political class achieve the people's trust? For that the government should overcome its shortcomings in governance on a war footing, especially in the health and education sectors. At the same time, we the people should also show patience. We want miracles to happen in an instant, which is not possible. I believe that positive change will come gradually and only through a sustained democratic process. After two to three peaceful political dispensations, without any interruption, people will start reaping the benefits of democracy. Let us give democracy due time to evolve and take root, and things will turn around for the better eventually.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 27th, 2016.
I won't go into the reasons behind the abortive military coup and won’t explore Erdogan's controversial ruling style. But we need to ask the question: why did the Turkish people take to the streets in the middle of the night on a single call of their elected president to defend democracy? Irrespective of differences over his ruling style and some serious allegations by his opponents, the fact remains that Erdogan is still the most popular, influential and charismatic leader in Turkey. How did he achieve this positon?
Since the 1960s, Turkey has witnessed four military coups, long-term political instability, economic downturn, rising poverty, and violent clashes between left and right wing groups, which claimed thousands of lives.
After this abortive military coup in Turkey, a debate raged in Pakistan over what would the reaction of Pakistanis be if democracy in the country was ever under threat. This is a difficult question to answer and at best we can only answer with a 'don't know'. However, given the state of governance in Turkey as narrated above, the situation in Pakistan in comparison is not that satisfactory. There is serious tension between the ruling PML-N and the opposition over the Panama affair. Public service delivery is in a poor state. There is a rise in disparities, with 38.8 per cent of Pakistanis still living in multidimensional poverty (which takes into account indicators pertaining to health, education and living standards), unemployment is also on the rise, more than 24 million children are out of school, the energy crisis is yet to be resolved, and except for China, our relations with our neighbours are getting worse by the day. These facts show the dismal performance of the government on all fronts. In such a scenario, it won't be a surprise if people start losing their trust in politicians and the system. However, despite the shortcomings in governance, the Nawaz government has a few success stories to its name too. There has been some improvement in the law and order situation in the country, terrorism is not as rampant as it was before Operation Zarb-e-Azb, and some economic indicators paint a positive picture of the economy owing to increase in trust of investors in the Pakistan Stock Exchange.
Based on the above facts, it is difficult to predict what the reaction of the Pakistani people will be in case democracy is ever under threat in the country. I would say that the challenge for the government and the political class is to gain the people's trust and win their hearts. Only then will people defend and fight to preserve democracy wholeheartedly and there will be no unconstitutional threats. Failing in gaining people's trust may lead to disastrous consequences. How can the political class achieve the people's trust? For that the government should overcome its shortcomings in governance on a war footing, especially in the health and education sectors. At the same time, we the people should also show patience. We want miracles to happen in an instant, which is not possible. I believe that positive change will come gradually and only through a sustained democratic process. After two to three peaceful political dispensations, without any interruption, people will start reaping the benefits of democracy. Let us give democracy due time to evolve and take root, and things will turn around for the better eventually.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 27th, 2016.