Hajj application: ‘Shia pilgrims are being discriminated against'

Ministry of Hajj to submit reply in Lahore High Court today


Our Correspondent July 15, 2016
Ministry of Hajj to submit reply in Lahore High Court today. PHOTO: AFP

LAHORE: Lahore High Court on Thursday sought reply from the Ministry of Religious Affairs on a petition alleging discriminatory treatment towards Shia pilgrims.

Syed Ali Hadi filed the petition, contending the authorities at the ministry had been violating its undertaking in this regard.

PIA to start Hajj flights from August 4

Barrister Maqsooma Zahra Bokhari argued on behalf of the petitioner that Shia pilgrims continued to face discriminatory treatment at the hands of ministry officials over Hajj facilities.

She cited the requirement of a mehram for Shia women applicants as an example of the discrimination.

The counsel stated that online form for Hajj 2016, did not accept applications from any woman without a mehram.

Saudi Arabia to hold trial over crane disaster

The counsel asked the court to direct the ministry to specify and provide facilities to Shia pilgrims.

She asked the court to direct the ministry to specify a quota for Shia pilgrims to avoid discrimination in selection of Hajj applicants.

Justice Ayesha A Malik heard the arguments and directed a deputy attorney general to submit the reply of the  ministry on Friday (today).

Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2016.

COMMENTS (6)

Gadeer | 7 years ago | Reply Let me elaborate for the intellectually challenged. What is being contested is the interpretation of Shia Fiqh...beliefs... Shia Fiqh does not require a mehram to accompany a female to perform Hajj. Only Saudi law does...that's political...not religious. Please do not politicise a religious belief.
Jamil Ahmad | 7 years ago | Reply A Mehram is required for any woman traveling for Haj either Sunni or Shia, I did not understand what is discrimination here.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ