As the dust settles

Published: June 1, 2016
Maulvi Haibatullah. PHOTO: FILE

Maulvi Haibatullah. PHOTO: FILE

With Mullah Mansoor now officially dead and confirmed as such by a DNA test, the F-16 deal throttled at birth by wary American legislators, and the Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG) dead but not yet buried, there is much that requires recalibration in terms of Pakistani foreign policy. In addition to the above, the new leader of the Taliban has made it explicitly clear that peace talks are not on the agenda, and the government of Afghanistan appears to have chosen to fight rather than talk. With the Taliban either holding directly or indirectly up to half of the Afghan landmass as well as having the military initiative, the fighting season promises to be long and bloody. Away from the battlefield(s), there is a regional geopolitical churn driven by developments such as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, the recent agreement between India, Iran and Afghanistan relative to the development of the Iranian port of Chabahar and adjustments in the global oil and energy markets which all point to deep and possibly fundamental shifts that affect Pakistan.

Given that there are a host of issues that fall within the ambit of foreign policy, it is surprising that after three years in power, the government of Nawaz Sharif has yet to appoint a full-time foreign minister, the portfolio being held by the prime minister himself. To a degree, the task is shared between a coterie of trusted advisers, but the Foreign Office is virtually leaderless, and rumours abound of ‘disarray’ therein. Given the current incapacity of the PM and the potential volatility of matters relating to foreign affairs, an early resolution of this unsatisfactory state of affairs is desirable. That said, foreign policy is in part if not whole directed from the establishment’s perspective to an unpublished agenda.

There is little positive to identify, but the newly functional border management system that activated on June 1 is one such. This is an effort to secure the Durand Line, long regarded as porous if not actually irrelevant as a border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Torkham crossing is the likely point of entry for many of those of ill-intent to Pakistan, and with 10-15,000 crossing daily with inadequate documentation, an obvious source of insecurity. This is no easy matter, complicated by agreements made during the colonial era regarding freedom of tribal movement as well as being expensive of human and financial resources. Afghanistan is far from a willing partner in this enterprise, worthy as it is, and it remains to be seen whether it will get beyond the ‘launch’ phase.

Notwithstanding the drone strike that killed Mullah Mansoor, violating Pakistan’s sovereignty yet again in the process, little is likely to change in the nature of the bilateral relationship. The protocols of protest will come and go but have little or no effect in real terms, being more to appease public and political sensitivities than make geopolitical readjustments. The unhappy marriage will continue and divorce is not an option. Neither side trusts the other and although there was a warming of relations at least on the surface in the last year, frost prevails below. This is a relationship that is going to remain eternally dysfunctional, a reality accepted by both sides. America will continue to press Pakistan for action against groups such as the Haqqani network, almost certainly to no great effect, and Pakistan will learn to live without new F-16s. Where good may emerge but slowly is in relations between India and Pakistan. Bilateral talks became comatose in the wake of the Pathankot attack much as was intended, but it appears that backchannels remained open and at least at the apex level, the two leaders, Modi and Sharif, are committed to edging forwards if not maintaining an edgy stalemate.

Pakistan needs a dedicated foreign minister and the longer the prime minister prevaricates on this is to our detriment — and to the advantage of those who may not wish us well and exploit an obvious weakness.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • curious2
    Jun 1, 2016 - 3:09AM

    Military controls foreign policy – when in doubt ask the American’s, Afghanistan, India, Iran, NATO, etc. Foreign Minister has always been a figureheads position – not something that is going to change a long history of terrible foreign policy blunders.Recommend

  • Srinivasulu Mekala
    Jun 1, 2016 - 12:11PM

    The Army decides everything. Either directly or indirectly, Army has always been the ruler of Pakistan. As long as this primacy and power of the Army remains, Pakistan can never come out as a true democracy, nor will it see true prosperity. Recommend

  • Shakir Lakhani
    Jun 1, 2016 - 4:14PM

    Why is the prime minister bent upon holding so many posts? Is it because he wants to travel all over the world at government expense? During the present stint in power, he has been out of Pakistan most of the time. He should start by attending national assembly sessions instead of flying off to London on the flimsiest of pretexts. The sooner he starts delegating responsibilities to others, the better it will be for the country. Recommend

  • Sad but True
    Jun 1, 2016 - 4:19PM

    Do you think a politician would have been in control of foreign policy even if there was one?Recommend

  • Irfan
    Jun 1, 2016 - 4:47PM

    A very realistic and incisive appraisal of reality, as it looks today, concerning the Af-Pak region. While it is very apt to say a few nice things about the virtues of democracy, it also remains a fact that democratically elected leaders of Pakistan, are corrupt and totally devoid of any feeling towards the nation and society. The recent expose, concerning the shell companies located in Panama, where the name of quite a few Pakistani leaders are being talked about, gives a clue to this malaise. Lastly, the slain Mullah Mansour’s successor seems made of sterner stuff, his rebuff to any negotiations, to which Americans are a party, is a pointer to that.Recommend

More in Editorial