
The debate and the proposed bill cut to the heart of one of the systemic ills that afflict the state — the inequality of access to justice, and the failure to promote qualified women as judges at every level of the judiciary nationally from small provincial courts to the highest in the land. The argument as the mover of the bill states has its origins in Article 34 of the Constitution that states “Steps shall be taken to ensure full participation of women in all spheres of national life.” Considering how widely the Constitution is disregarded in this respect, it is normative rather than exceptional that women are excluded from the Supreme Court as judges. That said, there is a constitutional procedure for the appointment of judges as pointed out by the law minister that requires amendment and this cannot be flouted, but amendment there must be if a manifest wrong is ever to be righted and women sit as judges in the Supreme Court.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 19th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ