Baghdad carnage — again
Once again, Iraq has been hit by a series of bombs that have killed at least 94 people and injured at least 150 more
Iraqis look at the damage following a car bomb attack in Sadr City, a Shia area north of the capital Baghdad, on May 11, 2016. PHOTO: AFP
Once again, Iraq has been hit by a series of bombs that have killed at least 94 people and injured at least 150 more. May 11 was the bloodiest day so far this year, and all the attacks have been claimed by the Islamic State (IS). Each of the three explosions targeted areas that have been targeted before, some of them multiple times. Although the IS is the claimant, the bombings are part of the wider political battle that has been raging in Iraq for years that is sectarian in its roots.
The political crisis in Iraq is multifaceted. There are external players working to destabilise the sitting government and separatist actors such as the Kurds and the Anbari tribes are also in the mix. There does appear to be a genuine will on the part of some politicians who seek stability and democratic plurality, but they tend to get drowned out by the extremists acting either to their own agendas or as proxies. On April 30, protesters briefly occupied the parliament building in Baghdad. They were demanding an end to sectarian quotas in politics and a meaningful fight against corruption rather than what is widely seen as a tokenistic response, as well as improved governance. Many of the protesters came from the target of the May 11 attack — Sadr city named after Ayatollah Muhammed Sadiq al-Sadr, father of the cleric Moqtada al-Sadr who is politically resurgent. With so many actors, the majority of whom are not committed to the peaceful resolution of the myriad conflicts that beset Iraq, it is difficult to see a way forward. A civil war is to all intents and purposes now raging, and it overlaps with the conflict in Syria. The IS may have been weakened by US air strikes but it is far from being broken and still has a firm grasp on its base in Raqqa. Western intervention in Iraq has left a toxic legacy that is decades away from dissipating.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2016.
The political crisis in Iraq is multifaceted. There are external players working to destabilise the sitting government and separatist actors such as the Kurds and the Anbari tribes are also in the mix. There does appear to be a genuine will on the part of some politicians who seek stability and democratic plurality, but they tend to get drowned out by the extremists acting either to their own agendas or as proxies. On April 30, protesters briefly occupied the parliament building in Baghdad. They were demanding an end to sectarian quotas in politics and a meaningful fight against corruption rather than what is widely seen as a tokenistic response, as well as improved governance. Many of the protesters came from the target of the May 11 attack — Sadr city named after Ayatollah Muhammed Sadiq al-Sadr, father of the cleric Moqtada al-Sadr who is politically resurgent. With so many actors, the majority of whom are not committed to the peaceful resolution of the myriad conflicts that beset Iraq, it is difficult to see a way forward. A civil war is to all intents and purposes now raging, and it overlaps with the conflict in Syria. The IS may have been weakened by US air strikes but it is far from being broken and still has a firm grasp on its base in Raqqa. Western intervention in Iraq has left a toxic legacy that is decades away from dissipating.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2016.