Dalglish optimistic after win

Liverpool manager set sights on winning a place in Europe after Pantsil’s own goal gave Liverpool 1-0 win over Fulham.


Afp January 27, 2011

LIVERPOOL: Liverpool manager Kenny Dalglish set his sights on winning a place in Europe after John Pantsil’s own goal gave Liverpool a 1-0 win over Fulham which continued their revival under the Anfield legend. Dalglish was able to celebrate a second successive victory following Saturday’s 3-0 win thanks to the blunder by Pantsil in the second half at Anfield.

The result has lifted Liverpool up to seventh in the Premier League and gave the Reds their first back-to-back victories since beating Bolton and Chelsea almost three months ago. Mark Hughes’ side squandered several glorious chances and left Liverpool wondering how they had not managed to earn even a point.

But Dalglish is confident Liverpool can climb higher and challenge for a Europa League place or possibly even a Champions League spot. “I think we are better than seventh,” said Dalglish. “We will not get carried away — we want to be further up there than that. We want to win more games and we will try and do that.”

Liverpool had an early Fernando Torres goal incorrectly ruled out for offside. After Pantsil’s error Liverpool were expected to then dominate but the opposite happened as Fulham looked the more offensive and disciplined side, but to no avail.

“I think Fulham will be feeling hard done by,” said Dalglish. “Fulham are very well organised and passed it about well but we got away with it. We are delighted with the three points and the commitment.”

Hughes admitted afterwards that he was at a loss to explain how his side had lost. “This was the total opposite. We came here and really took the game to Liverpool and not to get anything out of it is very disappointing because we certainly deserved something,” said Hughes.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 28th, 2011.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ