Of politics, power and polarisation in Karachi

Published: February 1, 2016
SHARES
Email
I I Chundrigar Road. PHOTO: EESHA AZAM

I I Chundrigar Road. PHOTO: EESHA AZAM

KARACHI: Mustafa Kamal, despite being considered as one of the most powerful mayors of Karachi, often complained of little control over the metropolis. He claimed the then City District Government Karachi (CDGK) only had authority over 32% of land in the city.

Kamal’s party, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), has once again claimed victory in the December 2015 local government elections which were held for the first time since his tenure ended in 2010. The MQM won 137 of 209 union committees (UCs) in all six districts of the city — a clean sweep.

With the people’s mandate in hand, the question remains: will the MQM fare better this time in terms of political authority?

Not if the provincial government has its way. Compared to the Local Government Ordinance 2001 which provides district nazims with administrative and policing powers, experts say administration under the Sindh Local Government Act 2013 (SLGA 2013) is not as empowered and the devolution of power stands disputed.

Transport, water, garbage collection and town planning or approval of new buildings are not in the hands of the city administration anymore.

From the Sindh Building Control Authority to the Sindh Solid Waste Management Board, and from Sindh Transport and Mass Transit Department to the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board, the power to make decisions lies with the provincial government.

“There are many cities in the world where there is multiple ownership of land, and its management, it is not such that everything is under the mayor,” architect and urban planner Arif Hassan tells The Express Tribune. “But a mechanism is formed on how to work together. Here, there is no such mechanism. Essential powers are being centralised.”

Stand-off imminent in Sindh

A report on current local government system by economist Akbar Zaidi et al, titled Local Government Structures and Creating Space for Women in Pakistan, states that the functions of these bodies in most cases are limited to municipal and civic amenities, and supporting the provincial government. In fact, Sindh local bodies have limited role of councils for supervision, monitoring and regulation in core service delivery areas, such as health, education, water and sanitation.

No financial devolution

Similarly, no matter how ambitious or limited the mandate of the local government, no system would function without a financial package, especially resource generation.

“Local governments neither have the financial resources nor the capacity to raise them. Without financial devolution and capacity-building at the local government level, it is clear that many of the tasks assigned to local government will be dependent on financial resource transfers from the provincial governments. This is not decentralisation in the true spirit of the term,” the report concludes.

“The revenue will be transferred by the federal and provincial government on their own discretion. If they like you, they will. Else, they may not,” says Arif Hassan.

The UNDP report on local governments, titled Local Government Acts 2013 and Province-Local Government Relations, states that the “…[SLGA 2013] provides limited autonomy to local councils in terms of fiscal management and control over service delivery, revenue, tax and police departments.”

Local councils would receive allocations through the respective Provincial Finance Commission Awards, having limited powers to impose taxes or exercise regulatory functions, it added.

“Though the local governments are deprived of their powers, they are expected to fulfill their responsibilities,” says Leader of the Opposition in the Sindh Assembly Khawaja Izharul Hasan in an interview with The Express Tribune.

“The situation is worse in Sindh,” he adds.

The MQM, in its pursuit to restore the powers of local government representatives, has submitted amended bills in the Sindh Assembly, organised protests, and is also planning to moving the Supreme Court.

“When the Supreme Court can force the government to hold elections, it can also [make the government] grant the powers,” says the opposition leader. “Provincial governments are obliged to legislate and introduce mega projects. It is the local governments, which look after municipality.”

Sindh’s minister for local government claims, however, all essential powers have been given to civic agencies.

“All powers are in line with the 1979 local government act, and similar laws have been enacted in all provinces,” says Jam Khan Shoro. “The MQM contested the elections under the same law and should not object.”

Commenting on the 2001 local government law, the minister says, “Extra powers were given by a dictator [Pervez Musharraf] after bypassing Parliament. This cannot happen now.”

Hasan, on the other hand, says federal agencies have large tracts of land, and unless they come under the planning parametre, Karachi’s issues won’t stand resolved.

“The Karachi Development Plan 2000 had a Karachi division physical planning authority, which outlined a plan for the coordination of all these institutions,” he says. “However, the plan did not materialise and could not be made into law. It remained a proposal.”

“Municipal powers should be with one authority so that it could serve across the board,” adds the MQM leader. Otherwise, he says, the mayor will not be able to answer each and every issue of Karachi.

The two main political parties of Sindh – Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and MQM – need to reach common ground on the matter, which for now seems to be a distant dream.

The importance of Karachi

While the ‘rural’ PPP has to its advantage a highly centralised system, it has failed to have majority representation in the city, and the Urdu-speaking MQM cannot control the city unless there is a highly decentralised system in place.

“Has there been any improvement in Sindh during the last seven years that we let them continue like this,” the Sindh opposition leader points out. “We will resist them and fight back for our rights through legal, constitutional and democratic means.”

Hasan says, “Both parties want Karachi’s revenues, and its control.”

He adds, “The existing stakeholders aren’t willing to give up their power. They are more concerned about their constituencies than the city.

“These things can be settled with new institutional arrangement,” he says. And what’s required for that? “Uske lye pyar or mohabbat chahye.”

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • Rishwah Dhaduk
    Feb 1, 2016 - 3:47PM

    All I read in this article is crying. Karachi is a mess because the stakeholders have not been able to overlook their personal egos and come to mutual agreements/resolutions to make this city a better place.Recommend

  • Peace of mind
    Feb 1, 2016 - 3:59PM

    M. Kamal enjoyed the significant level of powers under the dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf. I should make it clear that Karachi is not 100% colony of MQM supporters, it has vast number of people from different walks of life and that MQM does not represent them all (including not all Urdu-speakers). One man from a single controversial party cannot be taken as reliably just on different issues pertaining to the people. Recommend

  • Ali S
    Feb 1, 2016 - 4:12PM

    Now it’s becoming obvious that the entire local body elections was a massive exercise in blame-shifting for the Sindh provincial govt – now they can give up governance with impunity, loot and plunder all they want, eat up the funds meant for local govt, and when they’re asked about it they will simply say “Well that’s the local govt’s job, not ours”. Typical PPP mentality. I hope the Rangers and Supreme Court take them to the cleaners on this (and with Uzair Baloch about to sing, the time is ripe).

    MQM, despite all its faults, has the right overall perspective when it comes to governing Karachi – a city like Karachi needs to be governed by a locally based grassroots-level municipal govt that is not tied down by a hopelessly incompetent and corrupt rural provincial govt. And unlike PPP, at least they have a somewhat decent track record in municipal governance to back it up.Recommend

  • Napier Mole
    Feb 1, 2016 - 5:34PM

    Those who make peaceful revolutions impossible, make violent ones inevitable, so said Kennedy. The myopic attitude of the Sindh government which has distinguished itself among all the provinces of Pakistan by its corruption, incomptence and sheer mismamagement is sowing the seeds of a permanent division of Sindh by exercising its brute authority against the urban areas. For MQM it is do and die situation. If it fails to deliver then no one would be ready to listen even to its complaints. It has enough street power to get for Karachi what it deserves. If it sacrifies Karachi’s interests at the altar of political expediency, then it would have only itself to blame. Worse still, the day the fear of stick dies and that is already waning and no fully empoyerd civic administrative structure has been established to take its place, Karachi is going to become a permanently unstable city with consequences for the whole country.Recommend

  • Syedpk
    Feb 15, 2016 - 5:24PM

    @ Peace of mind
    yes Karachi is not the colony of MQM, but Karachi elected MQM to local govt. NOT PPP PML JI or PTI. Why does PPP get to have complete control over Karachi when people of KArachi have routinely rejected PPP continously. MQM is not asking power to be given to the party, but to the office of CDGK, which is an electable office.

    You should look into the term colony, colonism is done when an external force comes and establishes control, the term fits PPP not MQM. Until and unless Karachhites are given control of their city, the victim card will stay there, because at the end Karachiites are the victim as their representatives dont control the city. Regardless of which party get elected, be it PTI JI or MQM , who ever gets elected should get the control.Recommend

More in Sindh