Afghan reconciliation — another beginning?

The direct talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban may be expected to resume within days


Editorial January 12, 2016
Sartaj Aziz greets the Afghan deputy foreign minister as the US special envoy looks on. PHOTO: AFP

There is a lot of talking going on, much of it very quietly and not all of it in the public domain. The talks with India due to happen at security adviser level look like they have survived the impact of the Pathankot attack; and now the direct talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban may be expected to resume within days as a quartet of officials from Afghanistan, Pakistan, America and China met on January 11 to discuss modalities and protocols. These are delicate discussions and not wholly inclusive at this stage as the Taliban have undergone a re-categorisation. Nobody talks of ‘good’ or ‘bad’ Taliban today; instead there are ‘reconcilable’ and ‘irreconcilable’ Taliban groups. The Taliban remain as fragmented as they ever were, which makes any talks difficult to broker, with the ‘irreconcilables’ as far from the table as they can get, keeping their powder dry and watching to see how the ‘reconcilables’ comport themselves in coming days and weeks.



At the January 11 meeting, it was at least agreed that the peace process should be revived without further delay, a position that we strongly support. There are differences, not least between Pakistan and Afghanistan, as to how to deal with the irreconcilables. Kabul favours military action whilst Islamabad counsels a more pacifist approach and that extending a military threat at this point may damage the fragile structures that are beginning to emerge. We agree, if only because the reconcilables at the table were in many cases themselves irreconcilable in the not far distant past. Military threats are more likely to close doors than open them in this instance. The offer of talks must be open to all groups, and the opportunity to gain from a shift in position by any irreconcilable group must remain on the table no matter what. Equally, it is advisable at this stage to have no preconditions and although there is a possibility of ground that has already been gone over being gone over again; then so be it. There is going to be no quick fix, but any fix is better than none. Step carefully. 

Published in The Express Tribune, January 13th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (3)

Trollslayer | 8 years ago | Reply @Shuaib Afghans have been fighting and bleeding for the last 15 years. Pakistan has to dismantle Taliban safe havens and expel the rank and file of Taliban cadres from Pakistan and we will take care of the rest.
Shuaib | 8 years ago | Reply Afghans will realise they must fight this war, it is not Pakistan's war. If they do not fight it, Afghanistan will bleed.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ