Pakistan giving Taliban leadership to Haqqani network, claims India’s ambassador to Kabul

Amar Sinha says India should intervene as Pakistan is 'trying to convince Afghanistan to come along to a bad deal'


Web Desk December 05, 2015
India must intervene as Pakistan continues negotiations with only a faction of Taliban, Sinha said. PHOTO: EMBASSY OF INDIA, KABUL, AFGHANISTAN

Indian Ambassador to Kabul Amar Sinha has urged India to intervene in Taliban peace talks, claiming Pakistan is giving the group’s leadership to the Haqqani network.

Rivalries within the militant group are intense given the recent attack on Mullah Akhtar Mansoor in Quetta, Sinha said while speaking to The Hindu.

"India should intervene as Pakistan seems to be negotiating with only one faction of Taliban apart from giving leadership space to the Haqqani network, which is on the verge of getting international recognition as the de facto Taliban, due to Pakistan’s initiative," the paper further said quoting the ambassador.

Nawaz, Ghani agree to take ‘legitimate’ stakeholders onboard

Sinha warned that under the present arrangement with the Taliban, the Haqqani Network will be party to the talks. “How will the Haqqani network play a key role in future without being stricken off the terror list of various countries?” he questioned.

The consequence of Pakistan’s peace negotiation with the Taliban, he said, will be that the international community will be presented with a “fait accompli” of dealing with the Haqqani network as the legitimate Taliban leadership.

“Pakistan is trying to convince Afghanistan to come along to a bad deal with Taliban,” he alleged.

The Indian ambassador said that Afghans perceive India as a shining part of South Asia and they expect India to speak forcefully on issues of regional interest. “The Heart of Asia conference of December 7 provides a new opportunity to bring peace to Afghanistan and should be given a chance as it promises an Afghan-led peace process,” he maintained.

Souring ties : Pak-Afghan trade deals stall on India

Sinha’s statement came following ‘misreporting’ regarding his statement on a meeting between Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani in Paris this week.

The Indian ambassador to Kabul clarified that the Pakistani media and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reacted without perusing the entire text of what he had said. “Meeting of heads of governments in Paris is a positive thing. I stated that the statement of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in Paris is positive and we will see reduction in violence if we stay on a track built by consultation,” he upheld.

Further, he said Afghanistan’s cooperation with Pakistan under the present set of circumstances will mean Kabul is allowing Islamabad to determine the Taliban leadership which should not happen as Afghanistan's peace will have to be determined by the Afghans themselves.

Afghan chief executive casts doubt on Pakistan’s role in peace process

“Indian media should question the charade of Mullah Omar’s death, the quick coronation of Mullah Akhtar Mansour and the hurried attempt to start talks with Taliban even before the issue of Taliban’s leadership is resolved” Sinha told The Hindu.

The peace process was called off by the Taliban in July this year following disclosure that their longtime elusive supreme leader Mullah Omar had died over two years ago. The confirmation came barely days before Afghan government officials and Taliban representatives were to hold a second round of talks. The first rare face-to-face meeting between the two sides was held in Pakistan’s popular tourist resort of Murree in the first week of July.

This article originally appeared on The Hindu.

COMMENTS (24)

Pukar | 8 years ago | Reply @JSM: Bangladesh was East Pakistan, a part of PAKISTAN and not a colony. Now I know what kind of Geography you Indians are being taught back at home. No wonder Indians are the 2nd ignorant nation on earth.
JSM | 8 years ago | Reply @Pukar: Your legislature passes resolutions on Bangladesh Government actions. You do not share border with Bangladesh. Do not say that Bangladesh was a Pakistani colony in the past.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ