Activists chant slogans against the Blasphemy Law during a protest in Karachi. PHOTO: IRFAN ALI
ISLAMABAD:
In an apparent bid to ease pressure exerted by right-wing elements, the government has announced in clear terms it does not have any plans for repealing or amending the blasphemy laws.
In a policy statement to the National Assembly here on Wednesday, Religious Affairs Minister Khursheed Shah said the government did not own the private bill of a Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) legislator seeking to amend the Blasphemy Act.
Former information minister Sherry Rehman has tabled in the National Assembly secretariat a bill to alter misuse-prone clauses of the act.
Khursheed Shah said the bill did not reflect either the government or the PPP’s point of view on the issue.
“We [the government] have no intention of repealing the blasphemy law … ensuring the respect of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is part of our faith,” Shah said in a brief but clear statement.
The minister assured minorities that the government would also take steps to ensure that this law was never misused against them.
Right-wing political parties have been protesting since President Asif Ali Zardari announced a pardon for the Christian woman, Aasia Bibi, who was at the heart of a controversy.
The government had earlier indicated that it would at least amend blasphemy laws and formed a committee led by Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti in this regard.
Responding to Shah’s clarification, Maulana Attaur Rehman of the JUI-F said that the government should also dissolve the committee to prove its sincerity.
“It is a sensitive issue and there are deep concerns on it across the country,” said Atta, the younger brother of JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.
Drones counterproductive
Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani said that drone strikes inside Pakistan tribal regions were counterproductive and these attacks are helping terrorists accelerate their activity.
Responding to points of order raised by some members of the National Assembly from tribal areas, he said the political leadership and military had been successful in their planning to isolate the militants and separate them from the local people which had helped curb the incidents of terrorism.
On the issue of the arrest of Shahzain Bugti, Gilani said the government would take the house into confidence after the joint investigation team submits its findings.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 30th, 2010.
When will these people grow up??Recommend
First the Muslims of united India were scared of Hindus against the advise of Mulana Abul Kalam Azad. Hindus were relatively larger in their numbers and were not a big threat to Muslims. Now they are paranoid with the tiniest of minorities.
If the “Mercy for all creatures” were alive today, he (saw) would surely be saddened by these people who do craziest of things in his honorable name.Recommend
My observation is that the so called mullahs are disreputing Prophet more than anyone else….most likely this what they are supposed to do… I wish if Tribune can look into the roots of these people and expose…. But alas!! who can be courageous enough… these toads are making such deafening noise and no sane voice can be hearedRecommend
Thanks to Allah for that; As an Indian I totally support this; May all blasphemers go to hellRecommend
Your intolerance and xenophobia disguised as religious zeal is the bane of Pakistan – the very fertilizer that promotes fanatics who blow up innocents in mosques/food lines etc. Every Pakistani should be ashamed.Recommend
These tarnished rays, this night-smudged light,
This is not that Dawn for which, ravished with freedom,
we had set out in sheer longing,- FAIZ Recommend
Political niceties created this problem and is once again helping it grow.Recommend
shame, shameRecommend
Shameful, Powerless, Sham of a civilian governmentRecommend
Don’t have any doubt as to how Gahzni and Kenghiz khan invaded Asia. They used the same tacticsRecommend
Its western people’s anti-Islam policies that infuriate the Muslim youth all over the world who do not endorse the least act of aggression but who do register their discontentment on what happens on some parts of the planet (like Indians atrocities on Kashmiris in the Indian Held Kashmir). Have they ever asked the Hindus to stop LOC violation in Indian Held Kashmir? Have they ever forced the Jews to a peaceful settlement with the Palestinians? Have the human rights champions ever condemned ‘Holocaust crimes of genocide in the International Criminal court’ and termed them inhuman? If those world bodies laws cannot be challenged, then Blasphemy law cannot be amended; be those the Christians, the Jews, the Qadyanis or the other minorities or the foreign funded NGOs. Instead, they should stop bad mouthing against the Islamic Injunctions and live peacefully in Pakistan. In third world countries, it is easy to buy cheaply bad mouths while promising them some material or social or territorial gains. The country Blasphemy laws should be such that no body dares bad mouthing. In Pakistan, many blasphemers were given death penalties and some of them died under police custody. If a just verdict is pronounced under articles 295 A, B, C and 298 A by the Supreme Court, its legal implications demand that it be carried out. We must show them that we respect every religion but at the same time we are severe towards the blasphemers. If Asia Bibi has blasphemized, then she will have to face the consequences sans merci.Recommend