The conundrum of private education

While the fee hike may be warranting of the censure it received, demonisation of private sector is not so justified


Sahar Bandial September 14, 2015
The writer is a lawyer and a member of the law faculty at LUMS

In recent weeks, parents in urban centres have picked up the slogan “No fee till low fee” to object to un-notified and exorbitant fee hikes by private educational institutions. They have taken to the streets, launched campaigns on social media and approached high offices to draw attention to what they see as unfair and exploitive behaviour by commercialised educational enterprises.

Some response has been forthcoming. The chief minister of Punjab took notice of the matter and assured that private schools and colleges will not be permitted to arbitrarily raise fees. The DCO, Lahore promised to conduct an audit of these institutions. Commissioner Karachi Shoaib Siddiqui ordered that all fee increases, undertaken without prior permission of the government, be withdrawn. Following complaints, the Competition Commission of Pakistan has initiated an inquiry to determine whether the escalation in private school fees is a consequence of possible anti-competitive behaviour. These inquiries, audits and questions are a welcome development, possibly bringing under control a previously unregulated sector.

Yet, the simplistic reactions that this campaign has invoked tend to obscure the real issues inherent in our educational crisis. We have pitted the private against the public domain and deemed the former guilty of exploiting the vacuum left by poor government delivery in the education sector. We accuse business houses of having commercialised the most basic public good, a most fundamental human right — education — to reap undue benefit and unthinkable profit.

While the fee hike may be warranting of the censure it received, the demonisation of the ‘private’ sector is not so justified. Studies have demonstrated that the emergence and growth of private schools has made a significant contribution towards an increase in the overall enrolment rate, particularly in rural areas where government-run ghost schools appear to be the only ‘non-option’ (Andrabi, 2008). A review of the poor quality of instruction and infrastructure at government schools would further substantiate the important role private schools have come to play in our education sector. According to reports, low-cost private schools account for approximately 40 per cent of school enrollment in Pakistan. In the midst of grave government failure to provide competitive and quality education to our children, we cannot underestimate the importance of the private school system.

The private provision of education, however, is marked by its own evils. The difference in the nature and quality of instruction in private and public sectors embeds social and economic schisms that may well polarise society beyond cure. Though hailed for imparting a (relatively) better standard of education, many low-cost private schools cut costs and compromise on quality. According to a Unesco report, 36 per cent of grade five students are unable to read a sentence in English, a skill that they are expected to learn in grade two. The pursuit of profit drives the enterprise of private education to higher fee structure that we lament today.

Can the government take a laissez faire approach to private education and allow the market to even out imbalances till demand readjusts against the fee hike? The answer is a resolute no. Education is not comparable to any market-driven private good. It is key in shaping the minds and future of our youth and ought not to be left to self-regulation. The state is under a constitutional responsibility to provide free and compulsory education to children between five to 16 years of age. It has failed to fulfil this responsibility and must, at least, step in to check the exploitation in the private provision of education.

Some regulation in the province does exist. Pursuant to the Punjab Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2014, private educational institutions are prohibited from charging capitation fee and are obligated to educate a certain (disadvantaged) proportion of their student body for free. The Punjab Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulation) Ordinance of 1984 governs the registration of educational institutions in the private sector. This, however, is not enough. We require comprehensive and effective government oversight of private schools, which regulates not only fee structures but also the quality and content of instruction. The state will not have the moral authority to enforce such regulation till it fixes its delivery of this basic public good.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (4)

Concerned Citizen | 8 years ago | Reply The fee must complement the educational services provided by the private schools. This seldom is the case. For a fact I know that teacher turnover is very high in private schools. The owners believe that instead of increasing a teacher salary (annually), it be better to hire a new one with low salary. What it does to the children is that it deprives them of experienced teachers, which is the core in imparting knowledge. The teachers also don't get salaries during summer vacations, whereas the private schools charge tuition fee for the whole year. In a big private school system, there is no library in a school but the parents are told that there is a library period. Also the teachers are told by management to rectify student mistakes themselves so as to show that the student is doing well. I remember an Australian educationist was hired by a private school system to assess the education environment in which the students were studying and suggest improvements. She recommended to install ACs in each classroom as it improves learning by providing comfortable environment. The management rejected the idea based on cost impact. The policy of who should be exempted from tuition fee is based on what benefits such parents will bring to the school system (access to areas, security, personal benefits, etc.). I hope CCP looks into these issues and devises a system of fee structure that is relevant to ethical business standards and annual inflation movement.
Anticorruption | 8 years ago | Reply The unfortunate part is that the elite which has the power and clout to reform government sector schools has privatized its own education by going to these elite schools whereas everyone else has been left without decent educational opportunities. But now that this has happened and people do want to give their kids the best education that is available, these schools have the power to charge exorbitant fees. The current protests will at best lead to a partial reduction in the fees for a short period but even the reduced fees thus achieved will be huge. The only solution is in the form of fixing government schools or alternatively some parents coming together to set up their own schools with the goal of making education affordable. Given how much parents currently spend on education (in some cases about half of their salaries go into school fees), pooling in their own money to establish their own schools will be a much cheeper alternative. But then, it will involve the work of setting up the schools, appointing good management and its continued oversight which might be somewhat difficult for many. But that appears to be the only way out; otherwise be ready to pay the exorbitant fees charged by the for-profit private schools
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ