NAB references: Accountability court summons Zardari on Dec 23

Court had reopened graft cases against Zardari, stated his immunity ended when he stepped down from the presidency.


Web Desk December 09, 2013
Former president Asif Ali Zardari. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

RAWALPINDI: An accountability court in Rawalpindi ordered former president Asif Ali Zardari to appear before the court on December 23, Express News reported on Monday.

The court is hearing five National Accountability Bureau (NAB) references against Zardari.

The court had earlier decided to indict Zardari on December 9 in four graft references out of five pending against him.

References reopened

Just as the chief graft buster Qamar Zaman Chaudhry had assumed charge on October 11, an accountability court in Islamabad had reopened five references against Zardari and summoned him before the court.

The court notice had stated that Zardari’s immunity to trial ended with him stepping down from the presidency.

Cases

• Polo ground caseOne pending reference surrounds the illegal construction of the polo ground and other ancillary works at the Prime Minister House, which are in violation of rules and procedure.  In this case, the court had acquitted Saeed Mehdi, while the case against Shafi Sehwani, the former chairman of Capital Development Authority, was withdrawn following his death.

• SGSIn July 2011, pronouncing its verdict in the 13-year-old graft case commonly known as the SGS reference, an accountability court absolved all the accused, except Zardari.

In the SGS reference filed in 1997, it was alleged that then prime minister Benazir Bhutto and her spouse had received kickbacks in a pre-shipment contract between the government and SGS.

• ARY caseGrant of licences to ARY Traders for import of gold and silver caused losses to the public exchequer, amounting to approximately Rs18.2 million.

• Ursus tractors dealAnother reference, which pertains to Ursus tractors deal, deals with alleged misappropriation in the purchase of 5,900 Russian and Polish tractors at a cost of Rs150,000 each, for the then Awami Tractor Scheme.

The court had earlier had acquitted the co-accused Nawab Yousuf Talpur and AH Kango in the case. The Ursus tractors purchase deal allegedly caused a loss of Rs268.3 million to the ADBP and Rs1.67 billion to the State Bank.

• CotecnaThis case involved an allegedly corrupt award for a contract for supervising pre-shipment at the Karachi port.

The contract was awarded to the Swiss company Cotecna in exchange for a bribe during former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s second term. Benazir Bhutto and her husband were accused of taking a 6% bribe on the revenue stream the Swiss company expected on the $131 million contract.

COMMENTS (15)

Mirza | 10 years ago | Reply

@M behzad Jhatial: "And these cases will never be decided till his death…." Of course these cases are not going to be decided even when AAZ was in jail for 15 long years. These cases all in Rawalpindi would continue to blackmail politicians of smaller provinces. Why is it only LHC decides the fate of Sindhi politicians? Why no cases are being tried in Sindh HC? Rawalpindi already has the stigma of killing three of our civilian PM. Do we need more hatred in Pakistan? These cases should have been decided exparte in Pakistan more than 20 years ago. No excuses for the courts to sit on them. Regards, M

Sohail | 10 years ago | Reply I think those who are failed to prove authenticity of these cases despite spending billions of taxpayer money and despite the fact that Zardari was under the detention of governmentI think those who are failed to prove authenticity of these cases despite spending billions of taxpayer money and despite the fact that Zardari was under the detention of government, deserve severe punishments. This is only a political move and nothing to do with rule of law or the money of people..this is old game being played with new player (so called active and impartial supreme court)., deserve severe punishments. This is only a political move and nothing to do with rule of law or the money of people..this is old game being played with new player (so called active and impartial supreme court).
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ