Mumbai attack hearing: Indian court issues arrest warrants

In view of prayer made in the application, issue fresh NBWs against accused A­1 to A­9 returnable by January 4,...


Our Correspondent October 09, 2013
A view of Hotel Taj on fire during the 26/11 Mumbai attack. PHOTO: FILE

NEW DELHI:


The Indian court issued on Tuesday non-bailable warrants for two Pakistani officials in connection with the Mumbai attacks.   


Non-bailable warrants were issued against Pakistan Army officials Major Iqbal and Major Sameer Ali, top al Qaeda operative Ilyas Kashmiri— believed to have been killed in a drone strike, Pakistani-American David Coleman Headley’s handler Sajid Malik and former Pakistani army officer Abdul Rehman Hashmi.

The court also re-issued non-bailable warrants (NBWs) for Pakistani-American Coleman Headley, his alleged accomplice Tahawwur Rana, Hafiz Saeed and the Mumbai attack mastermind Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi.

“An application is moved seeking issuance of NBWs against nine accused persons. It is informed that the charge-sheet has already been filed in this case. Perusal of the record shows that earlier NBWs were issued vide order dated May 30, 2013. The same have not been executed as the accused persons are absconding,” Additional Sessions Judge Dharmesh Sharma said.

“In view of the prayer made in the application, issue fresh NBWs against accused A­1 to A­9 returnable by January 4, 2014,” the judge ordered.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 9th, 2013.

COMMENTS (1)

unbelievable | 10 years ago | Reply

Better late than never. I wonder what would happen to these characters had the Mumbai attack occurred in American - rhetorical question since we all know that most of these guys would be in the grave or sitting in a USA jail - and Pakistan would be under international embargo. India's handling of the Mumbai massacre has been terrible - shows a country which which lacks determination.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ