Without any exception, all of them instantly expressed the opinion that insidious operators of the so-called deep state would just not swallow the idea of General Musharraf’s trial for treason. A vicious game of either/or has rather been set between the elected government and the deep state after Nawaz Sharif’s dramatic announcement to prosecute the former dictator. They had no doubts in their mind as to who would prove the ultimate winner in this battle and anxiously started to speculate about the possible timeline of the end game. The collective anxiety of my colleagues made me worriedly realize the path dependent defeatism that rules the discourse in our mainstream media. Let me add, though, journalists were not alone in feeling pessimism on this count. Even the majority of PML-N legislators felt the same way in spite of endorsing their leader’s position with spirited desk thumping while sitting in the house. Off the record sharing of thoughts does not permit naming them.
I have it from highly reliable sources that Nawaz Sharif had delivered the Monday speech after preparing its draft after many rounds of brainstorming sessions in Raiwind over the weekend. For more than two hours, he also made himself disconnected with the world before summoning the speechwriter to dictate points for his Monday speech. Both the cell-phones of this speechwriter remained switched off during the past 48 hours.
Without defending or laughing at the cautious and secretive conduct of Nawaz Sharif, one has to admit that things since the suicidal landing of General Musharraf in Pakistan early this year have moved beyond the controlling capacity of a mere individual, even for a formidable politician like Nawaz Sharif.
We have a fiercely independent and hyperactive judiciary in Pakistan these days and it had firmly asked the government to state its position on June 24 regarding the question of trying Musharraf under the treason charges. The PML-N leader could just not afford to act forgetting and forgiving at this stage. After all, throughout the previous five years he had been harshly criticizing the PPP-led government for letting the former dictator leave, first the presidency and later Pakistan, with a formal sendoff glamorised by the guard of honour. After consistently agitating on this issue, he could not act “generous” while deciding on the same question after being elected as the Chief Executive of Pakistan.
Notwithstanding the obvious political compulsions of Nawaz Sharif at this point, we must think twice before setting ourselves to watch the suspense and thrills filled trial of General Musharraf. Discreet messages to the former dictator are still being sent to persuade him for adopting a position that could help find the safe passage for him in the end. In spite of desperate combing and beseeching, my sources are not willing to go beyond merely hinting at the strategy that Dr Qadeer Khan had adopted to elude trial when it came to selling Pakistan’s nuclear capacity and some redundant tools to some states, considered ‘rogue’ by the US-led international community.
For another time, Mehmood Khan Achakzai showed his large heart and calibre by stressing that the civilians should not take the decision of Monday as demeaning or maligning the armed forces per se. The Pakistan Army, as an institution, must not be held responsible for being thus undermined by the opportunistic and self-serving doings of a cabal of ruthlessly ambitious officers. Even if sounding an exceptional critic of Nawaz Sharif’s decision to try Musharraf, Sheikh Rashid Ahmad also preferred to strain his mind and leash his tongue for using a restrained language.
Ejazul Haq remained the one and only spoiler of the feel-good mood. The son of General Zia was deliberately provocative to recall Zulfikar Ali Bhutto with scathing words. Doing this, he somehow failed to notice that Aseefa Bhutto Zardari was sitting on a front bench in the visitors’ gallery. She witnessed the national assembly proceedings with studious keenness. With her watching so intently, the crowd of PPP legislators felt doubly annoyed with Ejaz-ul-Haq’s conduct unbecoming of an experienced parliamentarian on such a somber and epoch-making occasion. With his admirable vigilance, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan saved the day for another time with sobering intervention. Although, Ishaq Dar opted to stand as well to protect the government, but in the process quoted those articles of the Constitution that in effect would help those in the end, who passionately demand that General Musharraf should be tried for enforcing “the second martial law” on Nov 3, 2007. He and his collaborators deserve a trial for making the first move on October 12, 1999 as well.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 25th, 2013.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
So what should be the reaction of the true democrates for the leaders who caused division of Pakistan, who destroyed our industries and education system and who did political victimization of opponents. We Pakistanis will not tolerate destroying the economy, deteroriation of law and order, punishment of load sheding, unemployment , corruption, looting the public money in the name of so-called democracy. 98% people of pakistan are not the beneficiaries of this corrupt system.
Both ZA Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif are products of military dicators.
Who cares about constitution when a normal human being feels insecure for his life, has no food to eat or feed his family or cannot make financially ends meet. Who cares for a constitution when writ of state doesnt exist. At least these negatives werent there during Musharraf's time. If you ask me to choose the odds then Musharraf's tenure was best time for me and my countrymen. Plus he wasnt corrupt like these democratic despots. While media anchors i believe are biased as they aim to settle personal score with him. Only problem I find in Musharraf is im sad in saying this, that he is not a Punjabi. Victimization is being done against him to the full, sadly! If article 6 is being invoked why it shouldnt be from 1958 to esp martial law of 77 to Oct 99 to then later on. This is sheer victimization which me and other saner elements like me condemn to the core! May Allah be with you and make you victorious Musharraf sahab! Frankly Musharraf cannot be tried as holding in abeyance wasnt liable to be an article 6 matter back in 2007. It was added after 18th amendment was passed in 2009. So no legal bearing holds on Musharraf!
Oh yes, parliamentarians should mince their words about a democratic party that lets a teenager into the house, and state-to-state visits abroad. Please Javed sahib, do not impugn our parliamentarians' ability to criticise other leaders.
@M.A. Qureshi:
Opposition does not mean abusive language. ZAB is respected among the majority , not only those who voted for him but his political opponents also. Why cannot we make a covenant for not using bad language against each other. This is equally true in case of General Zia ul Haque who sometimes seems to be the most regretted personality of Pakistan, while as time goes by he is coming out to be much lesser evil.
@M.A. Qureshi: On 4th April 1979, more than 50% Pakistanis were illiterate, more than 50% lived below the poverty line, more than 70% did not have access to clean drinking water, and a big chunk of the population did not have a job either. Zia should have been working 25 hours/day to solve these problems, why did he waste the nation's time and focus in hanging Bhutto?
This is democracy, so why should we not tolerate an opposite point of view of a parlimentarian. Pakistan main issues are corruption, terrorism, load shedding, unemployment, economic disaster of the country. People of Pakistan are least interested in the trial of Pervez Musharraf who may have committed treason but he was not a corrupt leader of Pakistan.