Harness hidden forces or lose Balochistan, says Akhtar Mengal

Nawaz Sharif calls for reflection to avoid 'another East Pakistan'.


Sunara Nizami September 28, 2012

ISLAMABAD: Former chief minister Balochistan Akhtar Mengal on Friday openly blamed the agencies and military for the plight of his people and recommended peaceful separation of the province if the Baloch people were not going to be considered citizens of Pakistan.

Mengal was briefing the media after his meeting with Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) chief Nawaz Sharif in Islamabad.

“If the Balochistan situation is to be resolved, then that force which, in the last 65 years has governed this country, acted as masters instead of servants of this country, invisibly and visibly ran the country, considered themselves above the country’s constitution, law, people and the people’s representatives … should be harnessed,” he said.

He said that they had tried but failed and were now hopeless.

Mengal asked for his six recommendations to be implemented and said if this was not done, Balochistan would have to part ways.

Thanking the Supreme Court for taking a suo motu in this case, he said that none of the six points were contradictory to the constitution.

Answering a question posed during today’s hearing on the Balochistan case, he said: “Those people cannot be trusted, the whole world knows their reality,” adding that they even denied having “derailed democracy in the darkness of the night”.

Mengal regrettably said that Balochistan’s people were never considered citizens of Pakistan because if they had been, the atrocities committed against them would not have transpired.

In the same spirit, he posed a question to the civil society of the country.

“We want to know if Baloch people will be accepted as citizens of this country or not and if not, then it is better to part ways peacefully than to continue this bloodshed,” he said.

On boycotting local elections, Mengal simply said: “No country in the world holds elections during war and Balochistan has been in a state of war for 12 years.”

Another East Pakistan?

Nawaz Sharif requested the entire nation to learn from history so that another episode of East Pakistan was not repeated.

“People need to put their heads together and think what has alienated the people of Balochistan; the reasons, atrocities and the situation that made them think of this [separation],” he said.

Sharif said that even then, six points had been presented, the disregard of which had resulted in Bangladesh.

COMMENTS (21)

Aurangzeb Chowdhry | 11 years ago | Reply

We should analyse the situation indepth, why the Military has been interfering with the Political Governments, almost all the political parties have charge sheet of corruption against them keeping in view this impediment no political party thinks to confront with the Military or even with the bureaucrats of the country for the reason they know that they will be of great help to them in the smoothly flow of daily affairs which also involves rights and wrongs. Now again there is strong demand from PPP party to allow dual nationality holders to contest the upcoming National Elections.If anyone who so likes the Pakistan then he should opt for the Pakistani nationality for good. Now with the latest ruling of Supreme Court of Pakistan only Pakistan Nationality Holders can contest the general elections in Pakistan. with this ruling besides others the entire Bhutto family is likely to be affected, now they can not sail on two boats at a time, they will have to surrender their foreign nationality if they are so keen to the serve the Nation

curious | 11 years ago | Reply

Unfortunately the military is too powerful in Pakistan and once you give any segment of society too much power, they will fight tooth and nail if you want them back in their barracks. The tragedy is that anyone with influence in Pakistan can be easily bought with foreign money and foreign passports.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ