Alerts
 
< >

Contempt of court: Babar Awan indicted, refuses to accept verdict

Published: May 17, 2012

Babar Awan says no contempt law exists in Pakistan. PHOTO: RASHID AJMERI/FIRE

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan indicted former law minister Babar Awan on charges of contempt of court on Thursday, Express News reported.

Awan, however, refused to accept the verdict. “No law on contempt of court exists in the country,” said Awan.

The hearing was conducted by a three-member bench, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

Earlier, Awan had tendered an unconditional apology to the court, whereas the chief justice said that the apology letter was a confession of crime by Awan.

The former law minister was prosecuted for contempt of court adjudication after he criticised an apex court verdict handed down on December 1, 2011, pertaining to the formation of a judicial commission to probe the Memogate scandal.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (38)

  • May 17, 2012 - 12:26PM

    Like father, like son. :)

    PPP is full of corrupt personalities from top to root level. time to eradicate corruption and enforce rule of law.

    Recommend

  • Polpot
    May 17, 2012 - 12:26PM

    Luckily Dr Awan has an american PhD from the Motown University…..

    Recommend

  • aley
    May 17, 2012 - 12:28PM

    Who follows the Law Mr. Babar? Its the edict of SC which is supreme in this country so no law required if his majesty thinks so it is so…Squinted & Skewed like always….Babar’s abstaining from evidence in PM’s case even couldn’t help him earn IMC’s approval…

    Recommend

  • Shaheer Malik
    May 17, 2012 - 12:32PM

    Mr. Babar Awan you would have to accept the verdict.

    Recommend

  • riz
    May 17, 2012 - 12:45PM

    He deserved it badly!!

    Recommend

  • x-Ray
    May 17, 2012 - 1:05PM

    Then why he tendered unconditional apology to Supreme Court.?

    Recommend

  • Parvez
    May 17, 2012 - 1:12PM

    If laws do not exist then why have law makers and lawyers and judiciary and policemen. Get rid of the lot and possibly this would become a country worthy of being called a country.

    Recommend

  • Blithe
    May 17, 2012 - 1:22PM

    Joyous day!

    Recommend

  • Muhammad Ishaq
    May 17, 2012 - 1:27PM

    Court is damaging itself by these peety matters. And it should not take criticism as contempt.
    Our court is become political, so criticism is natural.

    Recommend

  • Hasan
    May 17, 2012 - 1:37PM

    And this man would know the law, after all he holds a doctorate (or does he!).

    Recommend

  • A J Khan
    May 17, 2012 - 1:39PM

    Where is the punishment???

    Recommend

  • maz3tt
    May 17, 2012 - 1:52PM

    the present politicians are so use to the pre CJ era that they can’t take any accountability. well they have to get use to it now.Recommend

  • Not me
    May 17, 2012 - 2:08PM

    He deserves it. This man is a blight on name of professional lawyers.Lawyers are officers of court when they appear before any court.

    Recommend

  • Rana
    May 17, 2012 - 2:15PM

    Babar Awan and Aitzaz Ahsan: Two sides of the same coin, what matters both to them is their professional arrogance

    Recommend

  • Temur
    May 17, 2012 - 2:22PM

    Babar Awan is just another PPP jiyala who is devoid of every kind of self-respect, integrity and morality. These people lie through their teeth and trample every law under their feet, they even treat the highest judicial body of this country as they treat their serfs. These shameless people quote Quranic verses and hadiths as if they were the epitome of piety, in reality even iblees looks like a saint before these devils.

    Recommend

  • Uza Syed
    May 17, 2012 - 2:35PM

    Only very petty minds with egos larger than themselves can feel contempted by difference of opinion, even if it is in matters concerning judiciary. Such decisions can only be interpreted as throttling of our basic right to have an opinion and need to express it, after all how can human mind be prevented from thinking and reflecting and any attempt at this is simply not on like any tyranny this also must be reisted with all the force to rpotest and our contempt.

    Recommend

  • elcay
    May 17, 2012 - 2:38PM

    If the contempt law does not exist, why in the first place he responded with excuses? Why did he not challenge his suspension of his lawyer practice in the SC and in the PBCA siting non-existant of contempt of law?

    Recommend

  • YP Toronto
    May 17, 2012 - 3:21PM

    Follow the Leader

    Recommend

  • Gul Khan Momand
    May 17, 2012 - 3:38PM

    @x-Ray: Simply Brilliant

    Recommend

  • Hamid Khan
    May 17, 2012 - 3:40PM

    This man must be punishised and disqualified to hold any public office.

    Recommend

  • Amjad
    May 17, 2012 - 4:21PM

    uniocular justice of biased judiciary

    Recommend

  • Singh
    May 17, 2012 - 4:51PM

    Pakistan has million of other very serious issue which need address & CJ is worried about contempt of court. Look like terrorism or corruption is non-issue. Wow

    Recommend

  • SM
    May 17, 2012 - 5:37PM

    A fake Dr with a fake degree from a university that simply does not exist. This man claims he is a religious scholar as well. God help a country where such people live.

    Recommend

  • Irfan
    May 17, 2012 - 6:16PM

    One gone a million more to go

    Recommend

  • Pakistani First
    May 17, 2012 - 6:47PM

    @Singh:
    Terrorism and Corruption are the responsibilities of the government.

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    May 17, 2012 - 6:59PM

    @aley:
    When would the PCO judges apologize for their high treason in aiding and abetting mutilation of constitution? You are right nothing helped Babar even his apology, which is usually sufficient to calm down the etotistic judges. In fact the PCO judge used the apology as a proof of his guilt! In the US there are no comptempt of court outside the court. Unless sombody misbehaves in the court there is no such thing as comtemp.
    Thanks and regards,
    Mirza

    Recommend

  • Incognito
    May 17, 2012 - 7:03PM

    @Irfan: billions to go :(

    Recommend

  • Logic Europe
    May 17, 2012 - 7:39PM

    Awan is a tiger and is brave learned and intellectual ,How come everybody seems to be contempting these judges,Is there a reason why people are insulting judiciary ,we must ask the question

    Recommend

  • M Umair Asghar
    May 17, 2012 - 7:54PM

    Congratulations…. !!!

    Recommend

  • asim
    May 17, 2012 - 8:32PM

    Honorable CJ is only hearing contempt court cases…..
    WHAT about the contempt of the country case….Criminals are ruling and SC is silent?

    Recommend

  • More Logic
    May 17, 2012 - 9:17PM

    Yes, mr.awan and people like him are insulting the judiciary, because mr. awan says, “No law on contempt of court exists in the country”Recommend

  • Logic Europe
    May 17, 2012 - 10:07PM

    mr more logic@ he is right ,thre is no such law and the one made by Musharaf is obsolete now
    THESE JUDGES ARE MAKING THEIR OWN LAWS ,THE RIDICULE OF PEOPLE AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IS OBVIOUS.

    Recommend

  • Lala Gee
    May 17, 2012 - 11:32PM

    @Mirza:

    “When would the PCO judges apologize for their high treason in aiding and abetting mutilation of constitution?”

    When PPP would apologize for her founder Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s role in aiding and abetting high treason against the state and people of Pakistan by supporting and working for the unconstitutional military government of Ayub Khan?

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    May 18, 2012 - 1:35AM

    @Lala Gee:
    The fact: There was no PPP in the days of dictator Ayub, so PPP never supported him.
    The fact that ZAB left dictator Ayub and waged a mass movement against him is apology in itself. The masses accepted him and new PPP and rewarded them with majority in several election. We were all non-Muslims but we embraced Islam and cannot be faulted for doing the right thing. Never in the life of any Bhutto did they support any dictator ever.
    On the contrary the SC judges never missed a single chance of military takeover and endorsing it. They have been repeating their sunnah without fail each time. That is the big difference. You can change and evolve and come to the right decision not be a lota.
    Regards,
    Mirza

    Recommend

  • Imran
    May 18, 2012 - 2:16AM

    @Lala Gee:
    According to which constitution, Kid? 1956?

    Recommend

  • Haseeb Chauhan
    May 18, 2012 - 2:19AM

    If people of Pakistan still think this way then soon in our Pakistan there is no law and congratulation for be this way@Muhammad Ishaq:Recommend

  • haseeb chauhan
    May 18, 2012 - 2:22AM

    Butcher always be butcher even he hold PHD and baber hold degree online so this kind of doctor only accepted by thiefs@Hasan:Recommend

  • Dr.A.K.Tewari
    May 18, 2012 - 5:52AM

    Awan will put the last nail in the coffin of the present judiciary in the Pakistan .

    Recommend

More in Pakistan