‘Memogate’ scandal: Haqqani says he never denied contact with Ijaz

Published: March 13, 2012

Former ambassador submits written reply, telephone bills to judicial commission.

ISLAMABAD: 

Categorically denying allegations by Mansoor Ijaz in the Memogate case, former Pakistan ambassador to the US, Husain Haqqani, said he never denied having contacts with Ijaz, but did not discuss any memo with him.

“All the allegations levelled against me by Mansoor Ijaz are baseless and there is no data to prove them,” asserted Haqqani in a reply submitted to the Judicial Commission on Monday.

Haqqani, through his counsel Sajid Tanoli, submitted a written reply and copies of his telephone bills from May to November 2011 to the commission investigating the controversial scandal.

Rebutting every point raised by Ijaz, Haqqani’s counsel claimed that the BlackBerry messages showing conversations between the self-proclaimed whistle-blower and the former ambassador were “dismissible”.

One of Haqqani’s counsels, while talking to The Express Tribune, said that the former ambassador will be flying to London on Tuesday with his legal team to testify and rebut allegations. He quoted a statement from Ijaz’s sworn testimony that the latter had admitted to conveying the memo to General James Jones without any instructions from the former ambassador.

Hence, Haqqani argued, there was nothing left in the case, and further proceedings should be scuppered.

The judicial commission probing the memo issue had directed Haqqani to submit a response on the evidence provided against him and to provide the commission copies of bills of his cellular communication, along with his BlackBerry Pin codes, in writing which he had used between March and November, 2011, by March 15.

Meanwhile in an email sent to The Express Tribune, Mansoor Ijaz said that former ambassador Husain Haqqani had ‘selective memory’.  Each and every statement in his response is indefensible, he said. “His problem and that of his attorneys is that they are now boxed into a corner from which they cannot escape.”

“Now he says he never denied having contact with me when just one month ago in his initial appearance before the Judicial Commission, he denied everything about the entire case, including having contact with me during those three days in May 2011 when he dictated the content of the memorandum to me verbally, edited the written version after accepting Gen. James L. Jones’ stipulation that the message had to be sent in writing, and then asked me to get it delivered to Admiral Mike Mullen for further action with, as he told me, his “boss’s approval”, the email said.

“Now he says the BlackBerry messages are dismissible, but so far, Mr Haqqani has yet to provide a single iota of contradicting evidence.  Neither has he provided his BlackBerry PIN Codes, or his BlackBerry handsets, or a waiver of privacy so we can put the matter to rest.” (With additional reporting by Asad Kharal in Lahore)

Published in The Express Tribune, March 13th, 2012.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (6)

  • Mr. Righty rightist
    Mar 13, 2012 - 9:53AM

    Ijaz looks like Sharath Saxena, a villain from Bollywood! Why do villains look the same?!

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0768296/

    Recommend

  • roshan zamir
    Mar 13, 2012 - 12:39PM

    haqqani is biggest lier….and if he is innocent then he should provide all the details to prove that which he never will…..we are a nation ruled by these worthless people who can sell us without us knowing….

    Recommend

  • Chanakya
    Mar 13, 2012 - 3:11PM

    @ Roshan Zamir, yes you people have ELECTED these bunch of politicians who are the backbones of these liars.

    Recommend

  • Shazia
    Mar 13, 2012 - 7:03PM

    This is the most burning issue in Pakistan and all judges of SC and three Chief Justice of High Courts should continue to waste their time and nation’s wealth in chasing the US double agent at all costs. Forget about the dozens of murders and dumping of bodies, forget about the Abbottabad, Mehran Base, poverty, injustices, healthcare fiasco, power shortage, and other cases rotting in courts. This Memo and the imaginary memo that courts want PM to write are the only issues for the PCO judges. According to the law Hussain Haqqani is innocent till proven guilty. The burden of proof is not on him but the prosecution which in this case are the “judges”. The judges and prosecution are the same for justice PCO style.

    Recommend

  • Zahoor
    Mar 13, 2012 - 7:07PM

    The point is well taken by Hussain Haqqani that if Mansoor Ijaz seeks forensic probe, he must bear the cost and the burden should not be on the national exchequers. Mansoor Ijaz is infact Manzoor-e- Nawaz, who aimed to topple the Government by making a non issue to a high profile issue linking it with national integrity. This is not simple as we take it. Since last three years PML-N used number of tactics to dislodge Government. Sometimes, minus one formula was popped up, time and again it was tried to pitch Judiciary against Government. Even Mian Sahib tried to create a face off between military and civilian government. On failing, another conspiracy in the name of Memo was created through a notorious personality of Mansoor Ijaz. Who not only several time criticized top spy agency of Pakistan but also leveled serious allegations against Pakistan military. Unfortunately , Mian Sahib once again failed to achieve the required political mileage from this case. Very sad indeed.

    Recommend

  • Arslan
    Mar 22, 2012 - 8:03PM

    So what if Hussain Haqqani admits having contacts with Mansoor Ijaz. I have hundred thousand people in my contact what does it mean that I become a part of their wrongdoings. Hussain Haqqani was the lobbyist for Pakistan; he might have contacts with several other central players in U.S political cadre. A lobbyist works for his country on the basis of these contacts. I wonder how we link between having contacts and writing memo. Contacts does not mean, neither give a prove of this thing that memo was dictated by Hussain Haqqani. Mansoor Ijaz might have contacts with President Obama but it does not mean that these contacts could be at a level that Obama can use Mansoor Ijaz or Mansoor Ijaz can influence Obama. All this is rubbish, contacts with Mansoor Ijaz does not mean that someone is part of his misdeeds.Recommend

More in Pakistan