And so, while the leaders of the current government continue to talk — with an eye-rolling credulity and a cute innocence, occasionally sugaring the grit, and claiming that it is not really their fault if the advancement of progress has been mugged by events — the country continues to drift on an uncharted ocean. The decision whether Pakistan should once and for all cut the umbilical cord with the super power, or just make a few incisions was, of course, discussed by the troika which includes a peerlessly servile prime minister and a terse and steely army chief. The ineffably wise and deceptively simple village elders in the north who display a grudging admiration for Iran who has exhibited a fierce independence, would like the country to go it alone. The rich and influential who live an exceptionally leisurely life and stand to lose a great deal would not like to rock the boat. They don’t have to worry because the Americans are being sensible and have toned down their rhetoric. The crisis on the international front seems to have passed. But what about the crisis on the national front, where the current government has established some sort of record for deficit financing and inflation which is crushing the common man?
In the United States and the United Kingdom, voters invariably tire of the government in power and cheerfully throw in their lot with the opposition at the next election. But even in those countries where the media is relatively free, important decisions that affect the people are not taken in an open and transparent manner, with a degree of public consultation along the way. Crucial matters are decided away from the public gaze in shadowy meetings of the rich and powerful beneath a cloak of secrecy. Things are no different in Pakistan. The difference, however, lies in the fact that while the Brits under Cameron have managed to do quite nicely, thank you, in Pakistan people desperately need a change of government. The tragedy is, voters don’t really have very much to choose from.
The PPP leadership has wasted a lot of time making alliances with other parties when their supreme was not traipsing around the world on goodwill missions. He has not really been able to come up with a single positive thought or programme that could benefit the country in any way. Even his secularism and fidelity were seriously in question when he couldn’t even attend the funeral of the Punjab governor who belonged to his party. Nawaz Sharif, who did leave behind him a short trail of achievements, did precious little for the women of this country and has the reputation of leaning a little too far towards the religious right. As for the religious parties, they refute everything that the founder of the nation stood for and want to turn the country into a theocracy.
The old guard has been tried and tested and has failed. What the nation desperately needs is a new leader, somebody with an unblemished political record, somebody who cares for the country and its people, who understands the need for implementing the rule of law and can stand up to the bullies wherever they are. The next election will be crucial. One can only hope the voters make the right choice.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2011.
COMMENTS (26)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ Ishrat Salim Sb Yes we understand the importence of change but we are in mess right now.
I wonder how you can suggest that US voters change the govt. in every elections, as far as my memory goes the previous two Presidents have completed two full terms in office, and by and Large Obama may do the same, and besides your article offers little in terms of Information or solution, what is also misses is the "Imran Khan" phenomenon, that has gripped Pakistan in the meanwhile, why don't you complete it and repost?
Dear Editor, I wish to translate this article in my mother tongue Marathi & publish it on the website of some Marathi newspaper. Whom should I write for permission? Regards, K B Kale, Jakarta
Mooraj Sb.,
You cannot take the name of Ayub Khan in the same breath as those that followed him. He was the last to BUILD infrastructure and insitutions. The rest tore it all down.
The rich stand to lose a lot? You must be kidding! In which country can you have all your assets in foreign exchange (abroad) and your liabilities in domestic currency (at home)?!
They are are set Sir, Emirates ticket in one pocket and a Canadian Passport in the other! They are all set to bolt having already sent their children away.
When someone like Mr Mooraj writes something as banal as this, its disappointing.
Countries and societies flourish because of ideologies and NOT good leaders charms. In democratic set up a leader has to show flexibility to the party manifesto and the wishes of coalition partners. In Germany, for example, coalitions have worked well because the greater interest of electorate and country is given more importance than following 'great' leaders. Hitler came to power in 20th century with great ideas of bringing Germany to top of the league and failed miserably. He in fact destroyed Germany, killed millions and had the country divided. When I hear this word 'great' leadership, i get the shivers. What Pakistan needs is democracy getting stronger and change of faces only after the electorate decide that. An edgy government, always forced to look over the shoulders to survive is not in a position to do any revolutionary. We have to scrutinize the manifestos of the parties to decide which side we are on. The problem is that there is a white elephant in the room and that is: Fundamentalists and their jihadi mindset. Pakistanis want to know if there are enough jobs in industry, education for the kids and hospitals when we get sick. How we spend our lives should be decided by us and not what the fundamentalists tell us. WE need great institutions, a constitution that is respected. Things will improve slowly but surely. Great leaders can wait in the shadows. Talking big is easy, delivering is more significant.
@Ali Tanoli
But why Worst Democracy? Why not good?
Mr Mooraj: Why not mention the name(s) of the leader who you think have character? The list is certainly that long! Why leave the readers hanging in the air!
the leadership always emerge from the people of a nation ,i am sorry to say the character of our comman man is touching the lower level of scale, if we get a wee bit of liberty, we start taking liberty ,we as a nation think that we only have rights not duties. dishonesty, bribe, intolerance have become our charecteristics. i think the change should be with in us .
@ Ali Tanoli "worst democracy is better than good dictatorship". You seem to have a faith based inclination.
"while the Brits under Cameron have managed to do quite nicely, thank you." Mr. Mooraj, I do not know what you are talking about. Austerity begets an economic slide and that is what is happening in UK. UK's economy is overly reliant on its banks. I would recommend you also read "Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men who Stole the World" and see how UK support of tax havens has contributed to the mess the West finds it self in. Of course it is also where the ill gotten gains of developing countries end up. See also: http://treasureislands.org/imf-it-was-deregulated-banking-that-messed-up-the-world/ Sep152011 IMF: it was deregulated banking that messed up the world
All arrows pointing in the direction of Imran Khan and his corruption free Pakistan Tehreek e Insaaf.
Thank you for putting in words the feelings of majority of Pakistanis at this time. I would summarize your article and subtle references in easy words: Vote for Imran Khan!!!
Pakistan need new system.
I would say get your vote register first and then when its the election day in 2013 get out of your drawing rooms and caste your vote. then we can have this debate.
Considering you served as executive director of the American Cultural Center, you might be able to shed light on the reason why the U.S. has been a benefactor and ally of every military dictator that ruled our country. As for saying Brits under Cameron have done quite nicely, I really think you need to live there to make such sweeping statements... the British, under Cameron's rule have seen riots, inflation and social unrest of a kind they have not experienced in decades. As far as a change of government is concerned, should we not take the path of democracy and wait for the government to serve its term and let the people decide......
Yaaawn...heard that one before... who do you propose? IK?
The voters make the "right" decision, and you will arbitrate on what is right?
i will say good or bad democracy keep running because this is the need of time and worst democracy is better than good dictatorship.
In the west if things get lot worst but peoples still give time to there govt to finish there term but in pakistan no body want to wait why not this respected govt finish there term when we will get civilized and stop calling army army army and when they comes we start blaming them for that.
Mr Mooraj, yes, I quite agree with your sentiments that Pakistan needs new leadership. So when are generals Kayani and Pasha going to resign?.