Recently, I attended a conference in Lahore hosted by the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan. The theme of the conference was “Justice for All and Impunity for none” and it was significant in view of the long list of international delegates including prominent lawyers from India and Sri Lanka. The conference was well-organised and successful in terms of the exchange of views between lawyers in the South Asian region on common problems confronting the justice system. On the issue of impunity, a few Indian lawyers openly expressed their resentment over how some powerful Indian politicians were committing crimes with no check whatsoever.
Generally, such conferences provide an effective forum for discussions about relevant legal issues, with the goal of devising strategies and proposing solutions to deal with problems related to the justice systems of both countries. For Pakistani lawyers in particular, such conferences provide a rare opportunity for substantive discussions on important legal issues. This rare opportunity is even more valuable if lawyers from India are in attendance.
During this conference, some lawyers appeared to be following certain protocols of being ambassadors of peace and goodwill. For instance, in his speech, a former attorney general of India mentioned how he had fallen in love with Pakistan a while ago during one of his visits. Another Indian lawyer was all praise for the Pakistani lawyers’ movement. While it may sound good and may even be well-meaning and sincere, it made me wonder why these lawyers do not share their views on contentious legal issues which have been the subject of debate and dispute between the two countries for many years. Is it because these lawyers think it would be controversial and distasteful, or is it because they consider it pointless as it would not be taken seriously by the governments on either side of the border? It is probably a bit of both.
It is about time these lawyers dispensed with these formalities and spoke their legal minds. Consider the potential benefits of an honest and strictly professional discussion by these lawyers on the issues holding the whole South Asian region hostage. In light of the sensitivity of these issues and the strong emotions involved, it would probably not be possible to have a purely professional discussion at least at the start of such a process. However, the politics and the policy parts of the issue could certainly be minimised, or completely eliminated, from these discussions.
Lawyers, because of their background and training, would be in a much better position to put forth definitive legal positions of their respective country, something that usually gets muddled at the state level in the political posturing and convoluted state policies on sensitive issues of strategic importance. The downside to such an initiative is the uncompromising approach of lawyers in trying to win every case. Negotiating on behalf of their clients to reach an amicable settlement is not something a lot of lawyers seem to be trained in, especially in Pakistan. However, despite this approach, a discussion between lawyers of both countries can serve as a basis for proposing legal solutions for resolution of these disputes.
Conferences and seminars are not just opportunities to exchange messages of goodwill and discussing the noble ideas of rule of law and justice for all. In light of the strained relations between Pakistan and India, these opportunities should also be used by lawyers to make some headway in relation to the legal issues that bilateral and national importance, and regional and global security implications.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 24th, 2011.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Exactly i agree with the view opined by commentators above. You got a lawyer movement funded by agencies and political parties, you got a CJ who never refuted any allegation on his son, enjoying unbridled powers. Instead of using the power of suo moto sparingly, he uses it as normal instruction given to his maid. For God sake Mr. Author come out of this world of illusion and start accepting the reality that we lawyer, or other professionals can not do anything other than to travel across the border and have a good picnic. when your foreign minister or even PM or President can not utter a word on Foreign policy without getting instructions from the concerned departments how lawyers are going to do any better. Lastly, when you have a lawyers of such a nature who shower flowers and congratulate other citizens on the murder of a human being can you expect anything good from them.
@N You rock. Great humour.
Is the author in fantasy land? The World knows Pakistani Foreign Policy starts and end at GHQ. What are the lawyers going to do ? Have free travel, free stay at top hotels, sumptious food, free sight-seeing and shopping - all at Tax payers expense. No SIr, No. Not on my money!!!
Mr.Author, Traditionally, the professionals like lawyers, doctors and engineers etc. were considered very respectable people, who were expected to perform their professional duties without any prejudices, biases, based on religion, race or nationality. These professions were considered as noble and above to all the narrow minded human categorization of good or bad. I am glad to say that some of these professionals in the history of mankind, really set high moral standards and precedents by their selfless service and ultimate sacrifices while trying their best to live up to the ideals they were supposed to uphold. You may think that it was just doctors, no sir, during the American civil war, it was the lawyers who did their best to wake up the conscience of people of the United States and they succeeded absolutely, which ultimately led to the end of shameful slavery in America. My question to you, Mr. Author is, do the Pakistani lawyers really deserve to be taken seriously? Don't you think that they brought shame to their noble profession by throwing rose petals at the self confessed murderer? Should the world take the Pakistani lawyers, as the custodians of law of the country they represent? In my opinion, no, certainly not, because they deserve to be shunned and boycotted by the rest of the world community, particularly, when, the president of Bar Association of Pakistan, Mrs. Asma Jahangir, too, maintains silence over the issue. Fans of Qadri, the murderer, have no place in the civilized world. Period.
Lawyers that represent Qadri would particularly be of importance. Judges who set LET reps free would also add a flourish to the exchange of views. Best yet, we should export this lot to India. Indians really need them more than us. We have too much drama, they too little.
The point understood. But these kind of meetings are essential not for law discourse but for the future. Some of those in these meetings will become policy makers, decision makers, politicians, judges and Diplomates during the passage of time and personal contacts become valuable then.
Will it be appropriate for the visiting law scholars to discuss the second amendment to the PAK constitution or blasphemy laws of PAK?