Secondly, the excuse becomes even more invalid if it is forwarded in the context of the centre’s own financial obligations that have instead of declining after the 18th Amendment have tended to increase. More so because it has not only not jettisoned the responsibilities that after the passage of the said amendment had become exclusively that of the provinces but has also added some new ones as well to the federal responsibilities, enhancing the centre’s financial burdens excessively. Even after the passage of the 18th Amendment, the provinces remain dependent on the federal government for funds, virtually rendering the fiscal autonomy promised by the amendment illusory. But the said amendment is the law of the land, not an illusion and can be violated only at the risk of being taken to the courts. Perhaps in its blind desperation to hit back at the PTI for its stance on the Panama affair, the centre seems to have lost its political cool and chosen to stifle K-P by withholding funds legitimately its due. This is an unacceptable attitude and given that the ruling party is often accused of being Punjab-centric, this does not do much for its popularity elsewhere in the country, especially in a province wracked by militancy and underdevelopment.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 27th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ