data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e78e/6e78e46ab3dc7849a35bd65ac8444f2f153dfada" alt="photo reuters photo reuters"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aac1/6aac1033756f7763fefb1a6e81cb0884af9a3ce1" alt=""
Humanitarian agencies have warned that the changing weather conditions could quickly lead to death and disease, especially among young children and the elderly. In this situation, we can only wonder why the local governments, now in place in K-P, have not been able to deliver help more swiftly. A spokesman for the provincial government has admitted that 10-15 per cent of earthquake-hit areas have still to be assessed with teams not yet able to do this. In disaster situations, time is never a luxury. This is especially true when people are compelled to live in the open in the bitter cold, or at best, crowd into flimsy tents for some protection against the elements.
We are also told that relief goods are being kept at the offices of district commissioners. The provincial government says local governments are not yet sufficiently organised to manage relief work. This is not a good sign. It has been some months since the local government elections took place in K-P and while teething problems are only to be expected before the system starts functioning smoothly, the level of efficiency, competence and capacity currently on display is not at all promising. At present, the local government system appears to be out of its depth. There is a need to assess why this is the case and most important of all, ensure that affected people receive help as quickly as possible. If we fail to deliver this, we may be looking at a further calamity caused by the aftermath of the quake and the failure to tackle the situation.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 5th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ