Of controversies and threats: Planning Commission reschedules meeting on CPEC

Paktunkhwa Ulasi Tehreek refuses to compromise on western route


Hidayat Khan October 31, 2015
PUT Chairman Said Alam Mehsud. PHOTO: fb.com/PakhtunkhwaOT

PESHAWAR:


The Federal Planning Commission’s invitation to the activists of Pakhtunkhwa Ulasi Tehreek (PUT) and political leaders from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa to discuss the route of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has been rescheduled for November 4.


The first meeting with the planning commission was scheduled for October 26. However, in the aftermath of the recent earthquake, K-P leaders were unable to attend it. The meeting has now been rescheduled for November 4.

Voice of dissent

PUT has been the most active in opposing the alteration to the CPEC route. Activists said the federal government was not ready to accept their reservations and was planning to stick to its own plan of creating the eastern route first. They said this was not only against the interest of the smaller provinces, but also against the plan agreed to earlier.

According to PUT Chairman Said Alam Mehsud, “The maps of the Planning Commission, federal budget and the budget of the corridor reveal that nothing is according to the agreement at the All Parties’ Conference (APC) held on May 28.” Accusing the Planning Commission of making changes without consulting all parties, Mehsud said if the route of the corridor was diverted from K-P, the economy of Balochistan, K-P and Federally Administered Tribal Areas would suffer enormously.

Talking to The Express Tribune, he said the government focused all resources on a single province and was bent on creating the eastern route first without considering the negative impact.

Warning bells

Under the chairmanship of Said Alam Mehsud, PUT activists announced a countrywide protest against the proposed changes to the corridor. “If the Centre does not address our reservations in the coming meeting, we will launch a protest and awareness campaign about the issue,” Mehsud said.

According to Farzana Zain, a member of PUT, rather than blocking roads, the protest will be geared towards creating awareness among people. She said lawyers, traders, transporters, students and all the other educated segments of society will be targeted for this purpose.

“The first meeting and awareness session will be held with the lawyers of Peshawar High Court on November 5,” she added.

Zain said seminars will be held and resolutions will be passed from provincial assemblies so that people can build pressure on the Centre and fight for their rights.

The other side

While talking to The Express Tribune, K-P Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz Spokesperson Nasir Musazai said, “There are some point scoring concerns, mass confusion and a general mistrust among provincial leaders about the construction of CPEC. All three routes will be constructed in due time.”

Musazai added the activists and nationalist leaders now want assurances over the dates for construction and exact locations through which the corridor will pass.

“The stance of PML-N leaders in K-P is quite clear; all the three corridors will be built step by step,” he reiterated.

The original plan

Under the initial CPEC plan, three corridors - western, eastern and central were to be constructed with the help of China. The aim was to connect Gwadar port to Kashghar area in China.

On May 13, the first APC was held where it was decided to form a parliamentary committee to oversee the project. On May 28, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif convened a second APC to gather a unanimous decision regarding the construction of CPEC. During the meeting, with the consent of all the parties, it was announced the western route of the corridor will be constructed first.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 1st, 2015.

COMMENTS (2)

Shah | 8 years ago | Reply Punjabi Government that is currently in power in center, are only concerned about punjab, and look not really concerned about the federation. They will never give the due right of small provinces like balochistan, yet we have to stand for our due rights. Moreover they are not constructing western route that will be passing through Balochistan, they will just make a single road where there is no road between any two cities, which is never a highway or motor way, Yet they are constructing 4 way motoro Way on Eastern route. So the natural major route on western route must be restored. Economic HUB must be clearly mentioned, and equally divided among provinces, that can be connected through web of roads with the Main Western Route. which is the shortest route between china and Gawadar. Infrastructure Projects must be equally divided among provinces, while giving priority to the small provinces to develop them specially balochistan, where the Gawadar Is located and later the people of provinces will be effected, by settlement of different people in this province and environmental and other chances, so they must also get some benefits accrued from this project. The Right of Province of Balochistan and Policy must be clarified for the people who are going to settle in the province, which must be a win win situation to avoid any discrepancies, as later in long run the Population of Balochistan will be changed in minorities as compared to settlers. To be Fair and Clear is Good and in the interest of the country and federation. Punjab should stop its plunder on the right of small provinces by its Dirty Games and dissimulations which punjab is good at only.
ishrat salim | 8 years ago | Reply If in the APC meet dtd 28 May, 15 under the lead of PM , western route was decided to be constructed first, then why change now ? how can we then trust this govt ?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ