Do citizens matter?

Unless citizens become aware of their rights & power, and develop a strong civic sense, governance will never improve


Rasul Bakhsh Rais September 30, 2015
The writer is a professor of political science at LUMS

The answer to the question posed in the headline, from the rapacious ruling elite is ‘yes’; citizens matter to them, and the proof is that citizens elect them into power. This is a familiar answer across all forms of governments and democracies, from the responsive and responsible ones to the nominal kinds. One thing that stands out clearly in all political forms is that ordinary citizens have lost their power to influence politics and major decisions. The organised groups, lobbies and powerful interests with wealth and skills at their disposal have captured the biggest political space in the developed world, while the traditional power elite in countries like ours have given no space to anyone. They reserve the slots for the next generation of their families and friends. Their monopoly over all sources of power, social, economic and political, is unquestionable. The ‘democratic’ competition is just a regular pattern of replacing one group with another. Pakistan has yet to see a power shift in any significant sense away from the non-elite sectors of society.

This is the reason why our rights as citizens are infringed upon. The ruling elite, facing no real challenge to their power, do nothing or do only that, which is populist to seek popular acceptance. They have perpetuated a political culture of passivity in society. How? When we demand our rights over certain issues, complain about the poor delivery of services, and get no justice in the courts, it makes no difference. If anything moves in the public offices, it is by ‘greasing’ of palms, or because one is well-connected through the agency of an influential family member, friend or politician. Over the decades, governments, both elected and military, have promised improved governance through innovative reform packages, but eventually they affected no substantial change.

Unless citizens become aware of their rights and power, and develop a strong civic sense, governance will never improve. We continue to live with an illusion that party-based ‘democratic, governments being in competition with one another will somehow improve the quality of public services, bringing about structural reforms, collecting more taxes, ending corruption and generating economic activity. As along as the same elite class dominates the rank and file of political parties, and form the biggest bloc of electable candidates, the citizen will remain at the receiving end. No major change in state-society relations is possible from the top. The push will have to come from below, from citizens organising themselves into associations and civil society groups that raise their voices through better networking. While civil society associations of various types have proliferated, they have yet to create a critical mass that forces governments to deliver.

Governance is the main channel through which citizens are connected with the political order. When it is weak, as it is in Pakistan, the relationship between citizens and the political order remains weak. This also results in the weakening of the legitimacy of ruling groups. There are basic things that we demand as rights — education, health and justice. Then there are other problems, like uncollected garbage, sewage flowing into streets, broken streetlights and unkempt parks. Resolving all these isn’t an issue of resources: it is an issue of poor governance and lack of accountability. The passivity of citizens makes the political class invulnerable.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 1st, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (3)

Parvez | 9 years ago | Reply Again a very interesting read........When the citizen reposes his trust in a leader and the leader once elected goes on to fill his own pocket and formulate laws that protect him and he disregards the trust reposed in him, there is not much the citizen can do except wait for the next election.....to see the whole thing repeat itself. The screening of candidates standing for elections is an important step in the filtration process that would produce credible leaders and needs to be done judiciously and scrupulously...sadly in the 2013 elections this did not happen.
Rizwan Bhatti | 9 years ago | Reply Sir, The poor mas is clamouring for their rights and situation is worse to the extent that they are unable to eke out their existence. The malady is that we are unaware of our political rights and privileges. The voracity of our political elites has turned our state into praetorian state.The public need to be conversant with political culture and chicanery of our snollygosters.stay blessed.regards
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ