
All the men sentenced were tried ‘in camera’. There has been little disclosure of where or how they were captured or arrested, and by whom. There has been no presentation of the evidence to support a guilty verdict and no presentation of the men’s antecedents, other than for one of them said to have been involved in an attack on Rangers in Karachi in 2011. The ISPR said that the men had been afforded legal counsel in their defence and that their trials were fair. Be that as it may, as information on the proceedings were not part of the public domain, it is difficult to ascertain this. There is a need for credibility to be attached to the way military courts conduct themselves. The perception that this is invisible and arbitrary justice, where the writ of habeas corpus does not run and invisible judges pass sentences on invisible defendants, must not be allowed to develop. Whilst there is an uncomfortable necessity for the military court in exceptional circumstances, such as the ones the country is passing through at this point in time, justice should still be seen to be done, even if only in part, for security reasons.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ