Diplomatic mission: US Quetta consulate plan put on hold

Security agencies, fearing law and order repercussions, advise against the building’s immediate construction.


Qaiser Butt December 21, 2010

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is waiting for an opportune time to allot a piece of land for the construction of the US Consulate-General building in Quetta, highly informed sources told The Express Tribune.

Though formal approval for the establishment of the US diplomatic mission in Quetta was accorded early this year, the government of Balochistan has still not taken a decision on the site for the consulate.

Security agencies have advised against the immediate construction of the US mission, contending that its presence in Quetta may worsen the already poor law and order situation caused by the armed Baloch insurgency. The Taliban are already furious over the presence of CIA and US troops at Shamsi Air Base-A, which is acting as a launch pad for the US drone attacks. The provincial government has been told to put the issue on hold till the appropriate time, a source said.

Shamsi air base was handed over to the CIA by the then president Gen Pervez Musharraf during his last years in power. The base, located in the Kharan district of Balochistan, is fully guarded and protected by the military. The local inhabitants of Kharan have time and again voiced resentment over the virtually free movement of the US armed personnel in their areas.

To win over Kharan’s residents, the US has initiated small welfare and healthcare projects about 250 kilometres from the country’s border with Iran.

A local, who requested to remain anonymous, told The Express Tribune that he had seen at least three US drones crashing while landing and taking off from the Shamsi base, a few months ago. One of the drones was about to hit a residential accommodation when it crashed into a nearby locality of the Shamsi base, he said. “People are scared and angry over the presence of the US troops in our area,” he said.

Kharan is also a base for Baloch insurgents who have maintained close links with Jundullah militants of Baloch origin in the Pakistan-Iran border area. Though the Iranians have not publicly reacted to the establishment of the US base at Shamsi near its borders, yet officials in Quetta noted their reservations when their ambassador in Islamabad visited the city in October this year.

The US will continue using the airbase, however the government is not satisfied with their payments for its use, said Defence Minister Ahmad Mukhtar in December last year. Earlier, the US was also reported to be using the Jacobabad and Pasni airbase for its operations in Afghanistan. In September, the former US ambassador to Pakistan Anne W Patterson said at a news conference that a US consulate will be set up in Quetta to oversee the development activities carried out by Americans in Balochistan. “It will also ensure a close liaison between the Baloch people and the US and will provide visa facility to the people of Balochistan,” she said while brushing aside allegations that the consulate was intended to keep a close eye on Iran and Afghanistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 21st, 2010.

COMMENTS (2)

A.S.Baloch | 13 years ago | Reply To be optimistic, I would like US to open their consulate at Quetta soon. It will not only facilitate Balochistan people in visas and over see the development projects but also will create a lot of jobs for Quetta residents in future. In present there are only tow consulates in Balochistan, Iran and Afghanistan where more are needed to create a good friendly environment and let the people of see the difference. It is a lame excuse to stop some one by saying Law and Order situation is not favorable, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa and rest of the country are picnic. As far as US presence is concerned they are every where.
RizwanTKhan | 13 years ago | Reply US should not be allowed to make the consulate. It will simply make it easy for US to further terrorize the region.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ