Kim angry with Kanye over Amber Rose

Kim reportedly went "ballistic" at Kanye when she found him looking at images of his former girlfriend Amber Rose


Ians July 23, 2015
Kim reportedly went "ballistic" at Kanye when she found him looking at images of his former girlfriend Amber Rose. PHOTO: PEREZHILTON

Reality TV star Kim Kardashian West reportedly went "ballistic" at husband Kanye West when she found him looking at images of his former girlfriend Amber Rose.

Read: Kanye West's marriage will last forever, believes his stepmom

The Keeping Up With The Kardashians beauty, who is expecting her second child with the Bound 2 rapper, was fuming when she found old photographs of Rose on his computer, reports femalefirst.co.uk.

"Kim found Kanye looking at Amber's Instagram page and went ballistic. It's really damaged her confidence. He told her she was being ridiculous. She then went to his computer and found he still had old intimate pictures and videos from their relationship.

"Kim was sobbing and confronted Kanye, telling him he had betrayed her, but he reassured her none of it was a big deal," a source told Closer magazine.

Kim, who is also the mother of two-year-old daughter North, is believed to be feeling even more insecure about her changing body shape as a result of her pregnancy.

Read: Kim Kardashian dismisses naming son South

"She feels insecure about her changing body and hates seeing Amber parading her amazing figure. She has told friends she sometimes feels like Amber is the third woman in their marriage and just wants something to be done to erase her out of their lives," the source added.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (3)

Anon | 5 years ago | Reply Why do such drama queens and publicity hogs (Kanye, Kim ) even exist. Can't we genetically modify them out of the human race
Arif Khan | 5 years ago | Reply Amber Rose.....is she allowed on Pakistan Internet?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ