Analysis: China pursues Pakistan nuclear deal; ignores reservations in the West

Beijing says it is supplying the reactors under the 2003 agreement.


Reuters December 16, 2010

SINGAPORE: China is moving ahead with a deal to export nuclear reactors to Pakistan despite grave misgivings in the West, in a sign it too can shape the rules of global nuclear trade after the US forced a waiver for India.

By winking at India’s nuclear weapons programme and opening up exports of nuclear fuel and material to the rising Asian power, the US had created an opening for China and Pakistan to pursue similar cooperation, despite the risk of proliferation, analysts said.

Under the 2008 deal, the US lifted a 35-year embargo on nuclear trade with India and then leaned on the 46-member Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG,) that lays the rules for peaceful use of nuclear exports, to grant an exemption so that a $150 billion market opened up.

China too is hoping to help meet the energy needs of Pakistan which was denied a similar deal by the US on the grounds that it had to improve its nuclear proliferation record first.

This week, as Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao travels to India first and then Pakistan, where he is expected to affirm strategic ties, the race to expand nuclear energy programmes in South Asia has added another layer of instability in a troubled region.

“The Chinese are proceeding with the export of the reactors, but they want to be prudent about it. They might want to look for some kind of support for it,” said Mark Hibbs, an expert on South Asian nuclear issues at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

China plans to build two new reactors at Chashma in addition to the one already operating there and another nearing completion. Beijing says it is supplying the reactors to Pakistan under a 2003 bilateral agreement that it signed a year before it joined the NSG, and that its cooperation with Pakistan is purely for peaceful purposes.

“China and Pakistan will further develop their nuclear energy cooperation, and this is restricted to the civilian nuclear sphere, and conforms to the international duties assumed by both countries,” Liang Wentao, a deputy director general at the Ministry of Commerce, told reporters ahead of Wen’s trip. “It is entirely for peaceful purposes, and comes under the safeguards and oversight of the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

No consensus

China has not formally approached the NSG to grant Pakistan a waiver in the same way the US, helped by Britain, France and Russia, sought one for India, and it may well argue that it does not need to win NSG clearance since the additional nuclear reactors were “grandfathered” before it became a member.

But Hibbs said the US and some other members have indicated that while China informed the NSG about its nuclear collaboration with Pakistan at the time of joining the cartel, including that it was building two reactors, it did not mention plans to build reactors 3 and 4.

At the last NSG meeting in New Zealand this year, Ireland raised the issue of new Chinese reactors for Pakistan, but China declined to comment. The next meeting is in June, but it is unclear what stand the group will take. “There is as yet no consensus in the NSG how to deal with this,” said Hibbs.

The group could either accept China’s assertion that the reactors were part of an ongoing project before it joined the group, or it could formally protest the sale of the additional reactors as a violation of its guidelines, or simply ignore it.

The bottom line is that both China and Pakistan see an opening for greater nuclear collaboration after the India-US deal pushed by the Bush administration that many saw as turning the rules of nuclear non-proliferation upside down.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 16th, 2010.

COMMENTS (15)

Anoop | 13 years ago | Reply @Jibran, "legalization of human rights abuses" --> Are you sure you want to talk about legalization of Human Rights Abuse, when you have such laws as Blasphemy laws and Hudood Ordinances? I hope you dont have a passport in Pakistan. If you do then you have personally contributed in exploiting of Ahmadis by signing such documents. http://changinguppakistan.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/picture-2.png So, dont you think your energies will be better utilized by fixing the Massive Human Rights abuse in the entire country rather than concentrate on a tiny part of India? But, I will take up the Kashmir Issue. The Human Rights abuse which happened there is very sad and condemnable. But, the good thing is people live in a Democratic Society and they will decide their own fate, ultimately, through vote. Also, if you are so concerned about Human Rights, why dont Pakistanis talk about such abuse in Xinjiang in China? India is after all an open society and as a result most of the abuse comes to light in one way or the other. No one speaks about the abuse suffered by Uighur Muslims. I have a lingering doubt that it has something to do with Pakistan's close ally and the need to please it. Why this hypocrisy? Even better you can devote your energy in bringing the people responsible for 1971 genocide in Bangladesh who are still roaming free in Pakistan as mentioned in the Hamoodar Rehman Commission report.
Anoop | 13 years ago | Reply "..we do not rely on aid and loans..." --> I used the words 'heavily dependent'. It might look like I suggested Pakistan might come apart without aid but what I meant was not that extreme. Here, is what BBC says about it: "With 28% of the budget being reserved this year for servicing Pakistan's huge external debt of $54bn, nearly 60% of the budget is taken up by just two items - defence spending and debt servicing. " http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/10375056 I am not suggest entire Budget of Pakistan is from Aid, but a large part of it is! Ahmed Rashid has this to say:"The entire development pool of $9.2 billion is provided by foreign donors." http://nationalinterest.org/print/article/anarchic-republic-pakistan-3917 This very Newspaper's editorial echoes my views. It goes,"Pakistan is heavily dependent on foreign aid and loans from international multilateral lending agencies." http://tribune.com.pk/story/57688/questions-of-sovereignty/ Not all aid is for non-military purposes. Here, is an instance of what US does for Pakistan military, which again lessens the burden on Pakistani economy. About 15 to 20 Billion dollar has been given, which is unaccounted for, to the Military. http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2010/1022/More-US-military-aid-to-Pakistan-It-can-only-do-so-much Now, onto India. India has a lot of problems, including Infrastructure problems. But, it is working on it. In 3-5 years it will become the fastest growing economy in the world and the kind of social and economic transformation which took place in China during the 1990s will happen in India. "Once that growth subsides" --> There are no signs of that happening anytime soon is there. Goldman Sachs says India will be the 2nd or the 3rd largest economy by 2050. That cannot happen if the growth number comes down, will it. I will trust a institution like Goldman Sachs than anyone person.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ