Why China should turn to Pakistan

Published: June 15, 2015
Email
The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as vice-president at the World Bank

The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as vice-president at the World Bank

Pakistan’s economic managers have not succeeded in reducing dependence on external capital flows. While the country will continue to receive significant amounts of capital from multilateral banks and continue to get help from the IMF, it is not likely to receive much financial assistance from the United States, its largest benefactor in the past. This is largely because of a fundamental change in America’s strategic interests. Pakistan mattered for Washington when, during the period of President Ayub Khan, it saw Islamabad as one part of a chain to hold back the advance of Communism. This was, again, the motivation during the period of President Ziaul Haq the Soviet Union arrived on Pakistan’s borders to invade Afghanistan. During the early years of President Pervez Musharraf, the ability of al-Qaeda terrorists to hit two places in America’s heartland was enough to persuade Washington that Pakistan was a critical for its strategic needs.

The world has changed since then. The Soviet Union has collapsed, the spread of Communism is no longer a threat, and al-Qaeda is no longer a powerful presence in the AfPak region. America took its revenge and Osama bin Laden, the main sponsor of the 9/11 attacks, was killed in 2011. The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (possibly spreading to Libya) could threaten America. It may get involved in beating it back in these countries. In this new geo-political situation, Pakistan is no longer of much strategic significance for the United States. In these altered circumstances, it makes sense for Islamabad to look at China as a source of external finance and Beijing is willing to oblige. During the April visit of China’s President Xi Jinping to Islamabad, Pakistan was promised $46 billion equivalent of capital, most of it in the form of project assistance.

Nations forge relations seldom for sentimental reasons. They do so for strategic reasons. Notwithstanding the hyperbolic pronouncements of the leaders of China and Pakistan about the nature of their relations – they have called these higher than the highest mountains, deeper than the deepest ocean – the two countries have strictly followed their interests. Pakistan’s reasons for drawing close to China are less complex than those of China. For Islamabad, transfer of defense technology acquired considerable importance after it was subjected to repeated sanctions by the United States. According to the detailed account provided by Feroz Hasan Khan in his book Eating Grass, it is clear that China’s help was critical for the deavlopment of nuclear weapons by Pakistan. The need for capital has been added as the motivating factor.  Some analysts have suggested that the attempt to balance India’s growing military might may be the third reason for Pakistan to get close to China. However, China was of no particular help during Pakistan’s two recent wars with India, one in 1965 and the second in 1971. It is unlikely that Beijing will intervene if for some reason there is another conflict involving India and Pakistan.

China has begun to look to Pakistan as an important player in its strategy to create space for itself in the region around its borders. Using its growing economic strength, China is spending more than ever on its military. Gwadar could become an important staging area for its rapidly expanding and modernizing submarine fleet. The reason for giving the navy so much attention is to protect some of the sea-lanes critical to Chinese trade. The narrow Strait of Malacca through which nearly all of its commerce passes, is of great importance as it could easily be blocked during a period of hostility. A strong naval presence in these oceans will serve as deterrence.

The proposed China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), will connect the port of Gwadar with the western provinces of China, a land-locked country, through road, rail and fiber-optic links. Some of the trade that passes through Malacca could use the CPEC as an alternative route. China is looking also at the rich energy and mineral resources available to be exploited in Central Asia. A United States investigation in 2010 estimated that Afghanistan was sitting atop mineral wealth valued at $1 trillion. Some of these mineral veins spread into Pakistan’s Balochistan province. The CPEC could be used to transport these minerals as well as oil and gas.

The large investment planned by China in Pakistan also serves to maintain the country’s faltering rate of economic growth. For the last 35 years, the Chines economy increased at the rate of about 10 percent a year. It is now 32 times larger in size than in 1979 when the economy was opened and the period of high growth began. That expansion was made possible by the export of cheap manufactures to western markets. But cheap labor is no longer available and the markets in the West are saturated. Investment in the domestic economy has worked to some extent but even that is getting exhausted. Foreign investment, therefore, becomes an attractive option and Pakistan provides an opportunity for this.  

Published in The Express Tribune, June 15th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (7)

  • Abdullah
    Jun 15, 2015 - 1:43AM

    Is that it?? ET please post meaningful analysis for a change. Coming from ex-VP WB and ex-Finance Minister, this article appears bogus.Recommend

  • AK
    Jun 15, 2015 - 5:57AM

    The author wad also part of the loony team of economic managers that is responsible for the fiscal mess of the country along with the directionless strategies of the politicians. Look, Pakistan has been reduced to a state where it seeks alms for survival and the author is continuing to indirectly advocate that. If not this donor, some other donor. China is doing it for its own reasons and not to get Pakistan out of its quagmire.Recommend

  • Pk_Paris
    Jun 15, 2015 - 6:33AM

    Last 3 paragraphs suit to subject of this article but first 3 shows mindset of finding a master & India concentric thinking. The writer is ex finance minister, no wonder the foundation of finance policies of Pakistan is such a mess with no priority for education, health & other social factors.Recommend

  • dUBYA
    Jun 15, 2015 - 11:51AM

    The “Slave”mentality ….Recommend

  • IBN E ASHFAQUE
    Jun 15, 2015 - 2:03PM

    Bankers do not think about investing in social development such as education and governance structures. Recommend

  • Feroz
    Jun 15, 2015 - 2:17PM

    When convoys of America carrying goods to Afghanistan were waylaid and thousands of containers looted and stolen, what makes one assume that the criminals and terrorists have now turned over a new leaf and will let go the opportunity to enrich themselves ? Author is making major assumptions of an economic revival without even a paragraph devoted to talking about the security situation that has driven international investors away from Pakistan. Appalling that intellectuals have lost the ability to think straight but hoping that security issues will sort themselves out. Good strategy and the ability to implement it without ifs and buts can only rescue Pakistan, not hope and prayer.Recommend

  • Abhi
    Jun 15, 2015 - 10:40PM

    I can see Pakistanis are really happy about this CPEC. Some times back it was Gwadar port which was suppose to make Pakistan a rich country no it is CPEC. It has been a long time since Gwadar has been there and nothing happened. This corridor is also going to be similar. The land locked area (Western Part) of China has very less economic activities and there is not much that can be exported/imported from that area. The purpose of this corridor and Gwadar port is only extending China’s military reach.Pakistan is not going to get anything out of it.Recommend

More in Opinion