Entitled "Jerusalemites running together" the five-kilometre route began near Jerusalem's Biblical zoo and followed a newly-built cycle path that traces part of the Green Line between the western side of the city and the annexed eastern half.
The event was organised by a local chapter of Runners Without Borders which has recently set up running groups involving youngsters from both sides of the city in a bid to strengthen ties between the two communities.
Thursday's event took place a week before the Jerusalem Night Run, an event organised by the municipality which attracts thousands of runners but which this year falls on the first night of Ramazan, effectively ruling out the participation of anyone observing the holiday.
Israel Haas, who heads Runners Without Borders, said he was disappointed that the city council chose the first day of Ramazan to hold the Night Run but said Thursday's event had offered an alternative, allowing Jewish and Arab runners to race together.
He said the aim was to build bridges between people in the city after a year marked by violence and inter-racial tensions which began last summer as Israel fought a 50-day war in Gaza.
The race was hailed by Zehava Gal-On, head of the left-wing Meretz party.
"Runners Without Borders is holding an alternative night race in Jerusalem this evening in protest over the disgraceful decision of the city council to hold its own official night race on the first evening of the fasting month of Ramazan, thereby excluding the many Muslims who live in the city," she wrote on her Facebook page.
"Runners Without Borders has started running groups of Jews and Arabs in Jerusalem, proving that even in this difficult and conflicted city you can do things together."
Israel seized the Arab eastern sector of Jerusalem during the 1967 Six Day War and refers to the entire city as its "united, undivided" capital. But the Palestinians want the eastern sector of the city as capital of their promised state.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ