West partly to blame for Islamic State: top Muslim cleric

World order wants chaos, it seems it has the intention of fragmenting our region and IS is a very effective instrument


Afp June 10, 2015
Egyptian grand Imam of al-Azhar, Sheikh Ahmed el-Tayeb gives an interview to Agence France Presse on June 9, 2015 in Florence. PHOTO: AFP

FLORENCE: The West has an interest in the "fragmentation" of the Islamic world and is partly to blame for the rise of Islamic State, one of the world's top Muslim clerics told AFP in an interview on Tuesday.

Speaking on the sidelines of a seminar in Florence, Ahmed al-Tayeb, the grand imam of Al-Azhar in Cairo, strongly criticised Western powers and particularly the United States.

Describing himself as "an ordinary citizen" as the Sunni Muslim seat of learning has no political role, the imam said: "The emergence of Daesh (an Arabic term for IS) in such a spontaneous manner leads us to ask what are the deep causes.

"And the man in the Arab street thinks that the West has something to do with it. The arms Daesh has are American, they are not made in the Arab world.

"IS developed so quickly and that required enormous amounts of capital. Where did these enormous sums of money come from. The man in the street says the West is not serious about taking on Daesh."
In support of this theory, Tayeb cited three parachute drops of arms which ended up in the arms of IS fighters.

"They said it was a mistake," he said, while sidestepping a question about the role of some Arab states, notably in the Gulf, in the development and financing of IS.

"If the world order, otherwise said America and the world, had wanted Arab cooperation in dismantling IS and its sisters and daughters, they could have done it in a single day.

Read:Terrorism: ‘Militants have nothing to do with Islam’

"The world order wants chaos, it seems it has the intention of fragmenting our region and IS is a very effective instrument. The IS performs a function for the great powers who do not want to see this region develop alongside Israel.

The imam said he would be happy to meet the pope but played down the importance of such an encounter. "If everything was in the hands of the pope or other religious leaders the thing could be resolved very quickly.
But the question is not about the pope or Al-Azhar, it depends on the political regimes which plan military, economic and financial policy.

It is the powers that have military bases and fleets in Arab waters."
Asked about death sentences issued to members of the Muslim Brothers in Egypt, Tayeb declined to offer any criticism of the military-backed government.

"I see that Egypt has overcome the problem. It is a stable country with a fundamental law under which a president was elected, and that was a democratic choice, completely democratic.

"Egypt is convalescing but we are are seeing an influx of investors who are returning," he said.

Asked about the Syrian and Iraqi Christians forced to flee their homes at the hands of IS, the imam replied: "IS has killed more Muslims than Christians.

"If you look at the percentages of victims, you will see that IS is an enemy of the Arab and Muslim world, and is perhaps working in secret coordination to fragment the Arab world."

COMMENTS (5)

S.R.H. Hashmi | 9 years ago | Reply I do agree with the grand imam of Al-Azhar when he says that the Western powers are behind the creation of IS though I will put the blame on some, and not all Western powers. The blame squarely rests on the shoulders of former US president George Bush and former British prime minister Tony Blair. Among the many reasons given by George Bush for invading Iraq, one was that got wanted him to invade Iraq. While Iraq is a Shia majority country, it was ruled by Sunni Saddam Hussain, who was basically secular by nature and the fact that a Christian Tariq Aziz held an important position in his government is a proof of that. Saddam Hussain’s military was also dominated by Sunnis though the reason behind this would be administrative and not sectarian. If he saw any threat to his rule from any quarter, he would deal with it ruthlessly irrespective of any distinction between Sunnis and Shias. In his time, there was no Shia-Sunni problem, and the country enjoyed a fair degree of peace and prosperity, with a large number of expatriates from all over the world working in Iraq. However, after invasion, George Bush and Tony Blair disbanded the Iraqi army without putting anything in its place. Obviously, a destabilization followed which took the life of nearly one million innocent Iraqis, and the killing is still going on, with no end to it in sight. Another destabilizing factor was George Bush and Tony Blair’s decision to impose on Iraq Nuri al-Maliki, a staunch Shia who dealt with Sunnis in a spirit of vengeance. And despite knowing and often complaining about Nuri al-Maliki attitude towards Sunnis, and knowing full well that he was not the person who could unite the Shias and Sunnis, the invaders kept Nuri al-Maliki in the saddle till the last, and replaced him only recently. Of course, the large number Saddam’s ex-military men joined hands and rose in revolt, and in time were joined by all sorts of thugs, scoundrels and murderers to make this so-called Islamic state which has now become a threat to the whole region. If the West had any good intentions, then after seeing what foreign intervention does to countries, they would not have interfered in Syria, in which unfortunately some Muslim states also played a dirty role. Unfortunately, the states in the region are unable to stop the onslaught of the IS and as for help from the West in countering IS, it is unlikely to offer anything substantial, with George Bush and Tony Blair probably enjoying the ‘excellent’ work they did in the region. Iran is helping fight against IS. I wish Pakistan government could also play its role in fighting IS which, if left unchecked, is sure to capture the region and in time turn on to Pakistan through its associates already present here. So, helping Middle Eastern states fight IS could help them and at the same be in Pakistan’s own interest because IS would prove something far more brutal and lethal than the Taliban, the al-Qaeda and other outfits. Karachi
Wisdom | 9 years ago | Reply Not partly, fully blamed because of those stupid wars they have started in middle east.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ