Muslim family expelled from Empire State building for praying get payout

Family believe they were targeted because of their religion

Web Desk June 10, 2015

NEW YORK: A Muslim family that filed a $5 million a lawsuit against the owner of the Empire State building after being forcibly removed for praying on the observation deck of the building, have settled for an undisclosed sum.

The husband and wife; Fahad 32 and Amina Tirmizi 30, who were removed from the observation deck of the Empire State building for praying, claimed their civil rights were violated along with their First and 14th amendment rights which are assured by the New York City and the New York State.

Two security guards approached them when they were silently praying and one rudely poked Fahad and told him they aren’t allowed to pray.

The couple claim they were ‘assaulted, battered and forcibly removed’ from the renowned sky scraper’s observation deck.

The family believed they were targeted because they are Muslims. Two security guards had escorted them to the elevator and lobby and then out of the building after telling them they are not allowed to pray.

Read:Islamophobia is a reality

“We weren’t doing anything wrong,” Fahad said. “We just wanted to enjoy the view like everyone else.”

The family say they walked to a quiet spot to pray. Fahad Tirmizi told the Gothamist that he has prayed in public before and therefore the expulsion was particularly shocking.

“Earlier that same day at the Staten Island Ferry terminal, I needed to pray the afternoon prayer and wanted to make sure I’m not in the way,” ­he said.

“I confirmed with a police officer who was standing right there to make sure it was a good spot. The officer responded, ‘Go for it, it’s not illegal to pray.’ ”

Earlier, the Empire State Realty Trust were reluctant to admit that the family's claim had merit, reports CNN’s Kristina Sgueglia;

“Claims are totally without merit and we will respond to them in court.”

Fahad and Amina's lawsuit said that:

“The Empire State Building has an unlawful [policy] that subjects Muslims to greater and/or heightened suspicion, security and/or surveillance compared to other religious and nonreligious individuals.”

The family as well as their lawyer Philip Hines declined to comment on the private settlement. The family adding that they aren't allowed to talk about it.

Last year their lawyer said to the NY Post:

“They weren’t bothering anybody, they were out of the way, and for them to be thrown out of the building is just an ignorant and shameful exercise in discriminatory conduct.”

The article articles originally appeared on NYP and RT


Vector | 6 years ago | Reply This is really good. Why to care for Empire State, go for Burj Khaleefa, but I am sure, no one will do that. Anyways now it's too common to hear that "This happen to me as I am muslim" Don't know when people will grow enough.
wb | 6 years ago | Reply @Ajax: "What you lot don’t understand is people have the right to pray, anyway they want in America. This includes Muslim." So, these two people were such fools that they did not know that Namaz times falls in the middle of their visit to Empire State Building? Or, they were such fools that they couldn't time their visit to this building between their prayers? Or, think about it, they thought, "Look, a namaz time comes in the middle of our visit, let's offer prayers from the top of Empire State Building, thereby discomforting thousands of Americans, 4000 of whom were killed by people of our religion. Let's be insensitive. Let's rub it on their faces. Two of the tallest buildings in the city are destroyed, now let's offer prayers from the tallest of the remaining buildings."
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read