Hate speech & intolerance

These instances show that a different kind of intolerance and hate speech continue to exist in the West


Imtiaz Gul April 28, 2015
The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad

As the debate over illegal immigrant workers who were heading towards Europe via sea, rages on, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, has drawn global attention towards intolerance and racism that is unfolding in many European countries. Hussein recently took on the London tabloid The Sun, which referred to migrants as “cockroaches” in an article published on April 17.

Hussein has asked all European countries to take a firmer stance on racism. He said that under the guise of freedom of expression, a vicious cycle of vilification, intolerance and politicisation of the immigration issue, as well as of marginalised European minorities, is being allowed.

The Sun article described migrants as “a plague of feral humans” and said that some British towns were “festering sores, plagued by swarms of migrants and asylum-seekers shelling out benefits like Monopoly money”. The columnist also advocated using gunboats to stop migrants, threatening them with violence, and said “drilling a few holes in the bottom of anything suspiciously resembling a boat would be a good idea too”.

This xenophobic take on the issue even in the face of at least 700 people drowning in the Mediterranean is symptomatic of a latent intrinsic rejection of foreigners by some sections of European society. The post-9/11 Islamophobia has woken up the monsters of intolerance and rejection of foreigners — whom the conservatives view as economic asylum seekers. It is not an unjustified fear but to use this to stir up hysteria even against legitimate victims of conflict is reminiscent of the anti-Semitism that the world witnessed in Nazi Germany. Hussein has talked about the happenings in Hitler-led Germany where the Nazi media, including Hitler himself, used to refer to Jews and communists as rats and cockroaches.

Here I would like to draw on a similar instructive episode in the US. On April 22, Brooklyn College held a talk by Pamela Geller, who compared Muslims to pigs and savages. The president of Brooklyn College, Karen Gould, was inundated with emails criticising the college’s decision to provide a platform for such opinions. “While I do not support or agree with Ms Geller’s positions, the Constitution’s First Amendment protects even the most controversial speech. As a public institution of higher learning, it is incumbent upon us to uphold the tenets of academic freedom and allow our students and faculty to engage in dialogue and debate, even on the most sensitive of topics.” Her words sound principled on paper but in practice, Gould has sown seeds of potential violence on campus.

These instances show that a different kind of intolerance and hate speech continue to exist in the West. It points at the human propensity to ‘otherise’ people or justify violence against others. This not unique to Pakistan alone. The foreign media has showered phrases such as hate speech, intolerance and radicalisation in the context of targeted attacks on religious minorities, women as well as Muslims at large in the country. This abhorrent tendency to demean ‘others’ out of political, racial or economic motives poses a challenge to all defenders of human rights, whether in Pakistan or abroad. We are all morally, politically and socially bound to speak and work for the preservation and protection of fundamental rights of every single person.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 29th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

ilyas | 5 years ago | Reply Just see our recent history and note that how our political parties misguided,misused and exploited students unions. They resorted to regular killing, which is extreme. It was all in the name of free speech. Today, if LUMS invites Mama Qadeer to present his side of the story in the name of justice than they should also invite Mullah Fazalullah to defend the killing of school kids in Peshawar, suicide bombing ,etc. After all there is hardly any difference between what Fazallullah has been doing and what Balochs have done by killing settlers. Whoever stopped LUMS from inviting Mama Qadeer, among others, knew its negative and adverse impact on young minds and took step in the right direction.
Gulwant Singh Bedi | 5 years ago | Reply The Sun is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Whose newspapers also spread their hate in Australia. And in US under the banner of Fox News. He is hated and reviled everywhere.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ