Shiv Sena advocates denial of voting rights for Muslims

Published: April 14, 2015
Email
PHOTO: AFP

PHOTO: AFP

Indian right-wing party Shiv Sena sparked controversy as it demanded the revocation of voting rights for Muslims.

“Vote bank politics is being played in the name of fighting against the injustice meted out to Muslims. Their educational and health status is being used politically. This politics was once played by the Congress and now every other person calls himself secular,” an editorial said, according to the Times of India.

The editorial published on Sunday in Saamana, the mouthpiece of the right-wing Shiv Sena party reiterated its late founder Balasaheb Thackeray’s statement that advocated the withdrawal of voting rights for Muslims.

“If Muslims are only being used this way to play politics, then they can never develop. Muslims will have no future till they are used to play vote bank politics and thus Balasaheb had once said to withdraw Muslims voting rights. What he said is right,” the editorial added.

Read: Shiv Sena to Indian Muslims: For special treatment, go to Pakistan

“The secular masks of all the so-called secular political parties will be worn out, once their voting rights are withdrawn.”

The statement invoked the condemnation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as well as the opposition Congress party and several others.

“The Indian Constitution has given every citizen, irrespective of his/ her caste, community or religion, the right to vote,” said BJP spokesman Madhav Bhandari. “Those who express such views are blatantly violating the Indian Constitution. Strict action should be taken against them for such remarks.”

Further, the editorial lashed out at All India Majlis-e-Ittahadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) MP Asaduddin Owaisi for challenging Sena president Uddhav Thackeray to come to Hyderabad.

“Owaisi dares us to come to Hyderabad. But we want to ask him if Hyderabad is in India or in Lahore, Karachi or Peshawar. The pride of Marathis is known in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kandahar as well.”

Read: India policy: Police block Muslim conference in Pune

“By saving the hiding place of snakes, you cannot kill them. Owaisi and his party are like a snake which, if fed, will do no good to the nation. AIMIM is an old snake,” it added.

The statement came a day after a Hindu Mahasabha leader claimed that Muslims and Christians should forcibly be sterilised to restrict their growing population, which, according to her, posed a threat to Hindus.

Read: Muslims, Christians should be forcibly sterilised: Hindu Mahasabha leader

“The population of Muslims and Christians is growing day by day. To rein in this, Centre will have to impose emergency, and Muslims and Christians will have to be forced to undergo sterilisation so that they can’t increase their numbers,” vice president of All India Hindu Mahasabha Sadhvi Deva Thakur said

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (6)

  • AB
    Apr 14, 2015 - 7:03PM

    Thank you Shiv Sena for keep reminding us that the decision to divide India based on two nation theory wasn’t that bad, if not perfect.Recommend

  • Internet Hindu
    Apr 14, 2015 - 9:48PM

    When will shiv sena and bjp stop playing politics with the hindu vote bank ?Recommend

  • just_someone
    Apr 14, 2015 - 9:56PM

    Modi’s India!Recommend

  • Ibrar
    Apr 14, 2015 - 10:28PM

    Shev Sena is probably doing this to seek attention as they often do. Its face is nothing other than a smelly bunch of subhumans. There can be a long debate on two nation theory but I have no doubt that in an undivided india these animals would have caused millions of deaths through their policy of polarisation and communal roits. Shev Sena and like minded extremists must feel happy and lucky that India was divided, leaving Muslims in small numbers. Imagine the force with which Muslims will retaliate to Shev Sena’s offences in undivided India and the possibility that the country would go on to disintegrate into many smaller countries. Shev Sena should therefore feel indebted to Muhammad Ali Jinnah.Recommend

  • Salman
    Apr 15, 2015 - 6:45AM

    @Ibrar: I agree with some of your points. However, if India had remained united the population of Muslims in united India would have been around 500 million. This would have had two results:

    The Muslims of what is now India would not be threatened as they are now by fundamentalist Hindus.
    The Muslims of Pakistan would not have been in a position to persecute the minorities in Pakistan and extremists would have remained in check.
    Recommend

  • Realist
    Apr 15, 2015 - 12:43PM

    @Salman

    Or, massive civil war between two roughly 500 million-strong religious groups would have caused genocidal-levels of violence.Recommend

More in World