Bilateral ties: US concerned over law regulating foreign-funded NGOs

Published: April 9, 2015
Email
Olson asks for expediting approval of Arif Habib’s investment in US. PHOTO: AFP

Olson asks for expediting approval of Arif Habib’s investment in US. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: As Pakistan moves to regulate foreign funding of non-governmental organisations under its National Action Plan to counter terrorism, Islamabad has run into concerns from an unexpected source: the United States. US Ambassador to Pakistan Richard Olson met with Finance Minister Ishaq Dar on Wednesday to address some of Washington’s concerns with the proposed new regulations.

“The views of relevant stakeholders and donor agencies should be sought before finalisation of the draft law,” Olson was quoted as saying by the Finance Ministry. Olson said that this would remove the feelings of unease among foreign donors.

The US ambassador expressed these concerns on behalf of local and foreign NGOs that have been worried about high-handedness by government agencies during the registration and monitoring processes for NGOs, many of which are funded by institutions based in the United States, including the US government. Islamabad is in the process of finalising the draft of Foreign Contributions Act aimed at regulating foreign funding. In many cases, the government does not have any records of foreign funding at all.

Dar said that the Economic Affairs Division of the Finance Ministry was working on the draft law for registration and was in contact with donor agencies and international NGOs and seeking their views. He said that all efforts would be made to craft a balanced piece of legislation.

The proposed draft calls for imprisonment for several violations of the law. The government is proposing a one year jail sentence for concealment of foreign contributions. Local and international NGOs would be required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, assuring the government that they would work within their jurisdictions and will abide by all Pakistani laws.

The Securities and Exchanges Commission of Pakistan was also in the process of scrutinising the record of NGOs already registered. It has recently revoked licences of about 108 such organisations which it deemed were not fulfilling the SECP’s requirements. The SECP has also sought details of bank accounts of these organizations from the State Bank of Pakistan, said SECP chairman Zafar Hijazi.

Arif Habib Group investment

Olson also raised the issue of delay in giving formal approval to the Arif Habib Group, a financial and industrial conglomerate, to make a $300 million investment in the United States. Dar had already agreed, in principle, to allow the Fatima Fertilizer to raise $300 million from international debt markets and invest as equity in a subsidiary called the Midwest Fertilizer in the US state of Indiana.

However, final approval is needed from the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet, but the Finance Ministry has not yet formally sought the ECC’s approval. The US ambassador’s intervention highlights Washington’s interest in the project that is expected to generate jobs in an economically depressed area of the United States.

Fatima Fertilizer, the Arif Habib subsidiary that is managing the investment, would issue the seven-year bonds in international markets to raise debt for the initial investment in Midwest Fertilizer. The bonds would be backed by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

Fatima Fertilizer will have a 35% shareholding in Midwest Fertilizer along with management control. The remaining ownership will rest with a consortium of international investors. The plant’s expected production capacity is said to be 2.4 million tons and it will cost $2.4 billion to build.

Speaking to The Express Tribune, Arif Habib, the eponymous chairman of the conglomerate, said that he had also met with Dar last week, urging him to formalise ECC approval at the earliest.

The US ambassador also raised the issue of FBR’s decision to deny input tax adjustments to US firm, Caterpillar.  The minister assured Olson that he had already issued instructions to the FBR to look into this issue and the matter would be resolved in due course.

The US Ambassador also asked Dar to press for an extension in the date for tariff determination by the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority for two oil exploration companies financed by the United States Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) as they needed more time to achieve financial close.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 9th, 2015. 

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (9)

  • truth hurts
    Apr 9, 2015 - 9:15AM

    Well well well!! Look who is choking? Atlast it is clear who are back bitters and destroyed this nation for 13 yearsRecommend

  • Urban Legend
    Apr 9, 2015 - 9:29AM

    I wish if Pakistani ambassadors in other countries also take this level of interest in inviting and securing foreign investments in Pakistan. We have our politicians more interested in investing outside, biggest name is NS himself, rather than doing it in Pakistan and inviting others to do the same. Recommend

  • S.R.H. Hashmi
    Apr 9, 2015 - 9:58AM

    When asked to name the capital of Pakistan, a young student once was reported to have said ‘Washington D.C.’ Now that was a child, but even a supposedly grown-up person like the US Ambassador to Pakistan, Richard Olson seems to firmly believe in Washington D,C. to be the capital of Pakistan. So it comes as no surprise that as Pakistan is trying to regulate the registration and monitoring process for NGOs, some of which are funded by the US government and institutions, Olson has come up with the demand “The views of relevant stakeholders and donor agencies should be sought before finalisation of the draft law.” And that means that Olson seriously believes that Pakistan should seek approval of US government and/or NGOs before framing any laws and procedures for application within Pakistan.

    We all know that a lot of problems in Pakistan have come about because of proxy wars financed and fought within Pakistani borders by Shia and Sunni rulers in their attempt to increase their areas of influence. Moreover, contributions from private citizens abroad to sectarian outfits in Pakistan also exacerbate the problem. And while the Americans are not part of this Shia-Sunni rivalry, they have not exactly been the friends of Muslims, and of Pakistan for that matter as the recent history very clearly proves. And while some of the US NGOs would indeed be doing humanitarian work, the possibility of some anti-Pakistan activity carried out behind the mask of humanitarian work, like doing spying work and other subversive activities, cannot be ruled out entirely.

    While in all countries, the activities by foreign-funded agencies are closely monitored, Pakistan government has been far too lax in this respect. However, now that the government has taken up this work in real earnest, it should not entertain meddling by Olson and the likes and do what is in the best interests of Pakistan and Pakistanis.

    KarachiRecommend

  • SK
    Apr 9, 2015 - 10:13AM

    Does US ask anyone, even international bodies, before finalizing its laws? secondly, if there is no other agenda except betterment of society which you are serving in than why worry about any laws which could help a country improve its fiscal monitoringRecommend

  • abcd
    Apr 9, 2015 - 10:59AM

    The right way around it is not to fund NGOs bypassing govt. ….the right way around it is to ensure free and fair elections next time and get rid of these nincompoop politicians….to promote honest people to take part in elections… then and only then will your NGO funds be utilized honestly and properly for the betterment of the people of Pakistan….Recommend

  • Proud Pakistani
    Apr 9, 2015 - 11:55AM

    Why are we letting Pakistani money go Abroad??? Be Pakistani buy Pakistani!Recommend

  • Arshad
    Apr 9, 2015 - 2:02PM

    Foreign funded agencies whether Madrasas or NGO’s they are the source of destabilization in not only Pakistan but everywhere. There is no free lunch as they say. The countries and organization that they spend there don’t do it for the benefit of the host country, in-fact some of these NGO’s function as intelligence agencies. Pakistan action to regulate these is a welcome step.Recommend

  • hadi
    Apr 9, 2015 - 2:47PM

    Oh man the level of hypocrisy by Pakistanis over foreign donation goes higher then the highest peak on earth! Your entire country including army is run on foreign and us aid. When these same people give meoney to NGO’s to fight for civil rights you have huge issues. Recommend

  • Other View
    Apr 9, 2015 - 5:46PM

    Olson mights have his interests, but a just and peaceful society we have create, can never be left on governments priorities. Say the word “NGOs”, and see negative reactions around. Most of today’s decision makers and government servants all have studied the syllabi fabricated by General Zia’s regime and his crook aides; hence majority does not believe in human rights and keeping accountability checks over governments through citizens voice and citizens’ organized actions. On the other side, governments in Pakistan always remained power hungry and never believed in civil rights voice and non-governmental (civilian) accountability check and balance over government affairs. Hence they had to keep choking the citizens-led institutions struggling for accountability, justice, peace and human rights. Trillions of dollars’ corruption by all governments in Pakistan has never been a more important issue than blaming NGOs due to few black sheep. Like other conspiracy theories, NGOs or civil society organizations are easy target of myriad allegations mainly of anti-state activities and corruption, although few might be involved in such things due to decades old inefficient (non)regulation by the government institutions who were responsible to do by law. For instance, if an NGO is involved in anti-state activities, whose inefficiency is it??? Of course of the governments, who were more busy in looting governments funds rather than focusing on good governance. Who stops a government to regulate every sphere of life in a country? NGOs are registered legal entities working under state laws. Of course these provide the frameworks on how NGOs will be regulated. Why were those laws no implemented properly? A reactive and yet another conservative regime of Nawaz Sharif and company is pressing already registered NGOs to get registered again; so once again NGOs are the target of hate without justifications. Now, it is another opportunity for PMLN government to choke the voice of the citizens institutions in order to silence the critics of their conservative policies, suppressive and selective service delivery and superficial fancy development projects which are never consulted with the local population while planning or implementing. As I have not ruled out the possibility of some NGOs doing bad, thousands of citizens-led institutions cannot be silenced on wishes of few monarchy-loving rulers. Many people can illogical jump to support government high-handedness on NGOs, because they have never stood in a queue to get food during a humanitarian crisis caused by some natural disaster or the government blunders. I am supporting NGOs because on many occasions I have witnessed them working day and night for the calamity hit people while government officials used to visit and arrange fake relief camps before any high profile visits. Even in normal times, governments don’t lend an ear to sufferings of the people. For example, in District Rajanpur, declaring a woman ‘kali’ and consequently killing or selling her is very common which is brokered mainly by some local politician and we don’t have any problem with it. But if any NGO will raise the voice, we will start screaming to call that NGO anti state. Now please tell this man, Mr. Dar, that you will come up with a balanced piece of legislation but NGOs are not working under SECP only. They are registered under 4-6 different laws of the land while your new fancy regulation is focused on SECP controlled NGOs only. We will be happy if this governments binds both the government and non-government actors to strictly follow the accountability checks and public consultations for all the development programs and start public reporting accessible to everyone mainly through online regular reports. Recommend

More in Pakistan