WikiLeaks has done substantial damage: Burns

US diplomats say they are out of business, no one wants to talk to them.


Reuters December 06, 2010

WASHINGTON: If you are a US diplomat accustomed to coaxing, cajoling or strong-arming governments behind closed doors, you will be out in the cold, at least for a while, because of WikiLeaks.

Current and former diplomats say the flood of US Embassy cables obtained by the website and the steady drip, drip, drip of embarrassing disclosures in the media have had a chilling effect on US diplomacy.

“In the short run, we’re almost out of business,” said a senior US diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity. “It is really, really bad. I cannot exaggerate it. “In all honesty, nobody wants to talk to us,” he added, saying it could take two to five years to rebuild trust.

“Some people still have to talk to us, particularly (in) government but ... they are already asking us things like, ‘Are you going to write about this?’”

“People outside the government don’t want to talk at all.”

The 251,287 US embassy cables have exposed everything from US views of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev as playing Robin to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s Batman to an American official calling Cuba and Venezuela an “Axis of Mischief.”

A handful of news organisations obtained the cables and began publishing stories about them, as well as some of the underlying documents, on Nov 28.

A US official said about 1,100 cables have been posted online by news organisations and WikiLeaks by late Friday, leaving another 250,000 or so that could surface to embarrass foreign governments, and Washington, for months to come.

A US diplomat in the Middle East said the foreign officials he deals with had not suddenly clammed up and he suggested the long-term consequences were likely to be more pronounced for foreign countries than for US diplomacy.

“That’s a temporary problem and in two or three years, maybe less, we’ll be back to doing business the way we used to do it,” said the US diplomat.

The official said in the Middle East there is often a disconnect between what leaders say in public and in private and, with the cables, people in closed societies may for the first time see that “in all its glaring inconsistency.”

“I think it will have a much deeper and longer-lasting impact on the societies here than it will on our ability to conduct diplomacy,” the diplomat said.

Former US Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger said he thought most foreign officials were likely to overcome any reticence with the United States within six months to a year, though he stressed this was a tentative conclusion.

“We’re still big enough and important enough that people are not going to be able to avoid talking to us,” he said.

US Undersecretary of State William Burns gave a harsher assessment in testimony before a congressional committee last week. “The reality is that the despicable breach of trust that we’ve seen through WikiLeaks disclosures has done substantial damage to our ability to carry out diplomatic efforts,” Burns said.

Asked which countries were particularly angry, a senior US official replied: “The easier question is, who’s not?”

Published in The Express Tribune, December 6th, 2010.

COMMENTS (2)

maitre | 13 years ago | Reply The wikileaks have unveiled US,and other World Power players naked faces, their conspiracies. They are all political, economical and military gangsters who dictate their terms on the world forum. Look at the Super Power of the world, the American politicians and diplomats are hostile and look for justification methods and policies through diplomatic contacts. Sarah Paline, in her statement said: 'Why we do not follow Julian Assange like Al-Qaeda and Taliban'. One can gauge from this comment how the wikileaks secrets cables are a blessing in disguise for every concious citizen of this planet. That is the reason, they have implicated him in a fake case and refused his bail. We, the deveolping world's people, should pull the wool over our own eyes and form our national and diplomatic preferences in order to kick in their face their rotten aid programs and liberate from the economic colonialism or neocolonialism.
Ashwin | 13 years ago | Reply haha they deserve it hope atleast they leave weaker nations to deal with their problem, rather then enforcing them
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ