The challenge of primary education

Published: March 28, 2015
Email
The writer is a professor of political science at the Lahore University of Management Sciences. He has also worked for the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad

The writer is a professor of political science at the Lahore University of Management Sciences. He has also worked for the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad

Primary education, the first few years of schooling, is the most critical phase in the learning process of a child. It provides the foundation on which the pupil, the school and the education system build higher layers. It is at this stage that the child enters the world of learning, knowing the people around him or her outside the family for the first time and gets some basic ideas about life, relations and the broader social world. Primary education is thus the formative level, where the teacher is trusted with the great responsibility to develop young minds. For this reason, many of the countries that have progressed in science, technology and human sciences have invested the best of their resources in education in general and in the elementary tier in particular.

With this comment on the importance of primary education, I wish to explain which types of ideas have guided primary educational planning in industrial societies. Most of these ideas that I am going to mention have universal importance, across different cultures, national boundaries and civilisations. These ideas are essentially about how to develop a human mind and embed it with values of personal success and a stronger society with a sense of community and solidarity, which are all applicable to Pakistan.

First of all, primary education has to be enjoyable for children. Learning for children can come from playing and doing things that create natural interest among them. What will attract a child to learning has been a subject of research for child psychologists, educational philosophers, curriculum designers and authors of children books around the world. The common thread among all of them is how to get the child’s attention and get her or him involved in learning. One of the methods that has been proposed and which is religiously followed in progressive schooling is interactive instruction. The teacher, more than an instructor, is a facilitator and a guide to students. This lets students think for themselves, as they try finding solutions on their own rather than expecting a perfect answer from the instructor. The instructor may lead them to what might be the right answer but before doing that, he lets students try, make mistakes and get there without his or her help.

Second, primary education is activity-oriented — children must learn by doing things on their own. Education is not about spoon-feeding but cultivating a thinking process. Third, education at this determining stage and even at the higher levels, is not about textbooks, no matter how good they are. At best, the texts are a guide or a launching pad to further tread the path of learning or move on intellectual trajectories. Supplemental readings, prepared according to the age of the child with attractive cultural symbols of the country — folklore, festivals, historic personalities and national events — sets children on a learning path of their own, with intellectual ease and deep interest. In this respect, there is much in the philosophy of education and curriculum design that a country like Pakistan can adopt in order to structure its primary level education.

Finally, from the very start, children must be given the confidence to raise questions. This is the best way to acquire knowledge at any stage in life. If children become confident in themselves, they can acquire the habit of countering authority, which at this stage, is the teacher. This quality is further developed with educational trips, after-school clubs, sports and group discussion sessions.

What I have attempted to sketch is not an ideal template but is based on observation of the public education system in some parts of the developed world. My idea of bringing these points here is that if these countries can implement such a model of primary education, we can also do it. Compared with what these countries have done, where do we stand in Pakistan and what is the way out? Unfortunately, education in general, and primary education especially, have never been a major concern of those in authority. The public school system at the primary level is dysfunctional for three reasons. First, the teachers assigned to teach foundational education are not as well trained as they should be. Second, they don’t seem to show an interest in the development of the child or take their profession as a very serious and fundamental component of nation-building. The dropout rate at this level is high, and one of the reasons for this is that teachers end up driving away children from learning instead of attracting them towards it. Finally, there seems to be no efficient system of retraining or accountability of public school teachers, although hopefully, this could change in the future. There are exceptions of self-motivated and conscientious teachers still out there and doing their bit to keep the system going.

The way out of the current state of affairs at the primary level is by restructuring the school system. The first step must be to devolve schools from the provincial and district education bureaucracy to the school itself. Teachers must be hired by the school, serve in the same school and retire from there. Second, some basic national standards must be established for hiring primary schoolteachers. Each province must follow them — provincial autonomy in education doesn’t mean a licence to play with the lives of poor families and most importantly, with the lives of children. Finally, we need to have a robust and modern curriculum design developed by the best educationists in the country. This must not be left to bureaucracies of the textbook boards. The issue is of ownership of the public education system and its complete overhaul and continuous reforms and availability of best human and material resources. There is a long road ahead, but this journey must begin now. It is never too late to devote to the primary national task of primary education.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 28th, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (3)

  • Luciferous
    Mar 28, 2015 - 7:29AM

    The fundamental principle is to educate child in his or her “mother” tongue; buildings, technology, style, curriculum content etc are secondary things.
    Second important thing is the teacher: Female teachers are the key since they already have gone through informal but fundamental training of being surrogate mothers to their siblings, nieces and nephews, have temperament to deal with children who have not developed abstract thinking yet, unlike a young man in his late teens or early teens who believes beating up children as an essential method of teaching.
    We need to develop Punjabi and Siraiki alphabets first. Then develop a curriculum in Punjabi and Siraiki, teachers’ training schools and books.
    I would suggest to develop Siraiki and Punjabi alphabet based on current Sindhi alphabet with some modifications since these three languages are very similar. Also this would provide ready curriculum for Punjabi and Siraiki languages. Also it would afford access to each other’s literature and poetry.
    But we are more consumed with hare-brained ideas like teaching Chinese and English nursery rhymes to our kids.
    Recommend

  • Tousif Latif
    Mar 28, 2015 - 7:04PM

    It is sad to know that a leading social scientist who has invested more than thirty years in this field while discussing primary education cites the examples of industrialsed nations.Sir in Pakistan our elite schools are imparting best quality education that is second to none.The problem is the public sector school.Suggesting ways and means to improve it or pinpointing hapless creatures known to be teachers is meaningless.Unless government jackup the education budget to atleast four per cent of GDP situation is likely to deteriote further.Our policy makers think that it a white man’s burden to donate for the education of the have nots in this country.Recommend

  • Fazal Dad
    Mar 28, 2015 - 7:41PM

    Oh Dear! You and I are the product of the same antiquated system and we made it like millions of others. So why to cry foul? Your point well taken seems utopian to me for two reasons: One, Pakistani culture where authority exerts itself (understand too much) and second I have seen the teaching in western settings where teaching takes place along the line that you are professing. Having taught for several years both in Pakistani and western higher education systems, I can easily say that there are strengths and weaknesses in both systems. Let us continue along the lines: reform, reorganize, and restructure a little bit but not all together. It is good to learn from the experience of others and pick up their strengths and incorporate in one’s own. My only suggestion is to take the religious paraphernalia out of curriculum and teach the truth and nothing but truth. Let the children grow up with a broader perspective of things, a vision for a better tomorrow, a positive attitude, a quest for inquiry, and without prejudicing their minds.
    P.S.: My thanks to all my teachers (from grade school to university) and salute to their greatness.Whatever I am, and where I am, it is because of you. Thank you, thank you, thank you………………..Recommend

More in Opinion