JF-17 Thunder: Govt to buy jet engines directly from Russia

“The Chinese NOC now allows Pakistan to import fighter jet engines from Russia directly,” a source said


Naveed Miraj February 14, 2015
Islamabad and Moscow had recently agreed to boost cooperation in several spheres including that of defence during the recent Russian defence minister’s visit to Pakistan. PHOTO: APP

ISLAMABAD:


Pakistan will directly import engines from Russia to manufacture its JF-17 Thunder fighter jets. The engines were earlier imported via China.


According to sources in ministry of defence production, China has recently issued no objection certificate (NOC) to Pakistan, which was earlier producing the fighter jet as a joint venture with China.


“The Chinese NOC now allows Pakistan to import fighter jet engines from Russia directly,” a source said. “This will not only reduce the cost of production of the fighter jet but will also lead to enhanced defence cooperation between Russia and Pakistan.”


Islamabad and Moscow had recently agreed to boost cooperation in several spheres including that of defence during the recent Russian defence minister’s visit to Pakistan. “This is a significant move since Pakistan had never struck any direct defence deal with Russia,” the sources said.


“Russia was clearly tilted towards India and the new Russian policy towards Pakistan is seen as a coup pulled by the country’s foreign policy.


Published in The Express Tribune, February 15th, 2015.

COMMENTS (7)

PrasadDeccani | 9 years ago | Reply @Anjaan: It is the same old market segment for Russia, not a new one. Pakistan was an indirect market before this decision was taken; now it is a direct market.
Vectra | 9 years ago | Reply China is not the producer of that Jet engine so is passed NOC but it willbe seen if Russian will adhere to that or reject.I believe they will go for later.Chinese NOC is not important but Russian NOC is.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ