This robust attempt to improve standards stands in contrast to the as yet poorly defined proposal — if there really is such a proposal — to arm K-P teachers in the hope that they will fight off any future attackers. Any such move would be both nonsensical and dangerous, and to even think that this would add anything to the overall security of the education system suggests that the person(s) so minded have not thought of the dangerous consequences that such a move could entail. Teachers must not be co-opted into a role they are unfit for. Rather than arm the teachers, the authorities need to look at how extremism may be countered, because perpetuating a toxic gun culture serves nobody; least of all children. Let us hope this idea is stillborn, unlike the proposal to test teachers. We need to get rid of the dead wood and recruit fresh and better-qualified teachers — which we warmly welcome. By all means let us improve education, but not with a Kalashnikov in the corner of the classroom.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 28th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Govt has made a very commendable and bold decision by allowing the teachers to bring licensed guns to the schools in spite of nonsensical criticism by media and so called NGOs
Those who have combat experience will tell you that a few hours training someone how to shoot a weapon doesn't mean they are prepared to defend your children from terrorist. It's a terrible idea that won't deter terrorist, won't protect the children, and won't provide political coverage for govt/military in the event terrorist attack school.
The next time a student does not do his homework, the teacher can pistol whip him