It is imperative that justice not only be done but also be seen as having been done, so that correct message can be sent out by courts PHOTO: AFP
In its ruling, the Supreme Court stated that decisions should not be taken in haste and both sides needed to be given sufficient time to present their case. Speaking for the government, the Attorney General of Pakistan had said that while the prosecution had been able to put up more than 50 witnesses despite the dangers faced by them and the series of threats made, it needed more time to solidify the case. This request had been denied by an anti-terrorism court on December 18, after which Lakhvi was detained under the broad Maintenance of Public Order law. The IHC had overturned this detention.
The Supreme Court ruling seems to make good sense. It is obviously important, for the sake of a fair trial, that time be given for all the facts to be put on record. This appears not to have happened in the Lakhvi case. The matter will now revert to the IHC which will resume hearing the case on January 12. The decision eventually reached in the matter could have far-reaching repercussions given the sensitivity of the case and the fact that New Delhi is also obviously very interested in the fate of those accused in the Mumbai attack and will be closely following developments at a time when tensions between the two nations are high. It is, therefore, imperative that justice be done, and also be seen as having been done, so that the correct message can be sent out by the courts at a time when they are under tight scrutiny.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732530816-0/BeFunky-collage-(88)1732530816-0-165x106.webp "article")
1720848500-0/Eminem-and-his-daugher-Hallie-(1)1720848500-0-165x106.webp "article")
Whatever may be the outcome of his trial in Pakistan. India reserves the right to nab him at first opportunity and try him in India for the offence committed by him against India and Indians.
It seems negligent on the part of prosecution to put its case together. It is a number of years now. The New York Times and CNBC have reported intelligence agency reports from India, England and the US, and the evidence seems more than sufficient to put Mr. Lakhvi and others behind bars forever. The ISI would have similar information if it tracks extremists and it does. Look at the Zrb Azb operation. This matter needs to be resolved. It did not take Pakistan long to put the person behind bars the person who helped track OBL in Abottabad. That is, when the establishment wants to.