In 2004, an anti-terrorism court sentenced Shafqat to death while he was just 14 years old.
The NGO, Justice Project Pakistan (JPP), also demanded that Shafqat’s name be removed from the list of terrorists, arguing that the government had lifted moratorium only on the death penalty of militants.
“Shafqat is not a terrorist and has no affiliation with any terrorist organisation,” said the JPP director Sarah Belal to The Express Tribune.
On Monday, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan announced in the National Assembly that Shafqat’s execution was being halted and an inquiry would be initiated into his case. However, no official notification has been issued thus far.
Karachi’s Central Jail Deputy Superintendent Shakir Hussain Shah said they have received no notification from the court or the government and the jail will go ahead with the hanging, if no notice arrives. “We require a notification to halt the execution. If that does not happen, the execution will be carried out on the scheduled date,” he said.
In the prison
Shafqat has now been moved to an isolated room, a special cell for prisoners who are sent to the gallows. The prisoner’s brother Majeed, who works in Rawalpindi, said he rushed to Karachi upon hearing the news about his impending execution.
However, Shafqat’s parents might not be able to see their son for the last time – if he is hanged. “We are very poor. Who would not want to meet their child before he is to die but we can’t afford to bring them from Muzaffarabad to Karachi?” says a sad Zaman.
‘#Saveshafqat’
As activists use Twitter to initiate a saveshafqat campaign, his family claims that he is innocent and demand reinvestigation of the case.
“Shafqat was forced to admit a crime he did not commit as they [police] tortured him,” said his elder brother Manzoor via phone from Muzaffarabad.
JPP spokesperson Shahab Siddiqi said Shafqat was tortured for nine days and forced to sign a confession. “He was beaten and electrocuted and burnt with cigarette. His arms still bear the scars.”
In the court, Shafqat spoke about the police torture but the court did not order any medical examinations.
His lawyer did not even challenge the death penalty awarded by an ATC, in spite of the fact such punishment could not be given to a 14-year-old, whose was convicted on only one piece of evidence, his confession, Siddiqi adds.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th, 2014.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
What a stupid report this is without informing the readers of the "crime" of Shafqat. ET, please make sure such incomplete reports are not published.
Confessions under torture should not be allowed. Why wasn't his allegations of torture investigated? He was no more than a boy at the time. Which barbarian tortures a child?
Mr President, please commute his sentence and re-investigate the crime, as well as the allegations of torture AND hold those responsible accountable.
WE ARE NOT SAVAGES!
We are at war and in war there will always be collateral damage . We suffered ours and now it's time for them to suffer theirs .
Wonder what these so called rights groups have done for the victims of rape and acid throwing ??? I never see any concrete steps being taken on the two massively growing crimes
Justice please. If not, mercy please. Dear President, You cannot be so insensitive. We expect this pardon.
Why so called human right organizations always put their weight on accused side.
It is very right that a juvenile should not be hanged, However no one is going into the detail that why he has been condemned? What crime did he commit and of course with all their short comings our courts still have sense and without solid reason they will not sent anyone to gallows. So the whole picture should be brought to the light before making hue and cry. The wave of sympathy is understandable, but the reasons of court should also be kept in mind.
A juvenile can not be sentenced to death further confession to police is inadmissible. This report is incomplete about the facts of the case.