However, it will be unfair to put all the blame on the media for extremist narratives. True, a young media in search of influence, a role in society and the mesmerising attraction it created for itself in a society freshly liberated from the ‘one-channel-only’ policy of the state, placed itself on a wild horse — not exactly knowing anything about its vision or even its basic obligations towards society. The speed with which it rode through public opinion was dizzying for itself. With that, the state lost all control and the civil society, still young but growing, could offer very little resistance in the media. They were overpowered, intimidated and even slaughtered by groups engaged in terrorism.
Those in power, Pervez Musharraf and his allies and two successive party governments, did little or nothing in showing resolve or leadership to counter extremism and violent groups. Rather, for a very long time, those in powerful positions thought of violent, extremist groups as allies, supporters and part of the ‘grand strategy’ to win larger battles in the region. This created a deadly confusion over ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban — the latter being a euphemism for violent groups. Pakistan’s power groups — both state-based and those from the political stream had hardly any understanding of what long-term effects such tolerance of militant groups, and the tolerance of their narrative becoming dominant, will have on the rest of society. Frankly speaking, they didn’t care about what might happen to society and to the people. This is always the case when a society has no real say or power in selecting who rules over it.
Three narratives have gone largely ignored or inadequately countered. First, ‘these are our people’. This is what the sympathisers and apologists of extremist groups have been saying for decades. The impression that this carefully and socially sensitive phrase has created is that the Taliban are good people, they are well intentioned and are fighting for a good cause. This came in the background of the glorification of the Taliban rule in Afghanistan. Their capture of Swat was not enough to wake up anyone in power. It was the public flogging of a woman and horrific stories of public executions that finally moved the federal and provincial governments. Too much damage had already been done. Owning extremists and terrorists as ‘our people’ is equal to being with them. This must stop now.
The second narrative is that ‘our people cannot do this’ or that ‘Muslims cannot’ commit such terrible acts, like suicide bombings, attacks against minorities and other sects. The apologists shift the blame to ‘other’ countries, forces and agencies. Weaving conspiracy theories transfers the responsibility to invisible foreign hands. What about the Taliban or similar terror groups claiming responsibility for attacks against the security forces and the unsuspecting civilians getting along with their daily lives? The answer lies in the third narrative of the terror apologist — they are acting in self-defence. Finally, this is ‘not our war’ is yet another narrative that dominates. Such assertion is shocking when we see the terrorists not even sparing our children.
At last, the political parties, the security establishment and the government are on one page. Let us hope they don’t play the old games again.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 2nd, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
When the PPP and ANP the two secular parties were denied a level playing field with threats in the last election, alarm belles should have rung loud and clear. The elections were definitely rigged not against PTI whose claims are hollow but for the Taliban sympathizers --- PTI, PML(N) and JI. Suddenly all Media players are blaming everybody except themselves when they themselves were pushing the filth under the carpet by voicing and supporting conspiracy theories. Now we see an about turn, but these are chameleons that will change their colour to suit their convenience.
Since 1947 partition you have never considered Indian Muslims other than Kashmiri Muslims as Muslims. Since 1950s you never considered Bengali speaking Muslims as Muslims. The list goes on. What happened because of your obsession with Kashmir and Urdu. You tried to bleed India,but you are bleeding. You tried to impose Urdu on East Pakistan, but it gave birth to Bangladesh. Still you refuse to learn from history.Yet to accept the reality. Accept your people as such. Do not try impose anything on others against their will. Educate them to live in harmony with other sects, faiths and races. Above all keep religion away from the government.
Dear Mr Rasul Bakhsh Rais
Your identification of root cause for tolerating terrorism is correct and apt. You rightly criticized the Government institutions and bashed them for their follies and ignorance for not looking beyond their nose. But you appeased / pardoned the media due to inexperience (so called nascent age). Don't you think that Media provided a vehicle to terrorists and their sympathizers for forwarding their agenda and obtain support from already confused masses. Media, fully aware of their powers, tried to influence the government policies and mold public opinions. Therefore, pardoning them is unintelligible. Same goes for so called civil society, if political parties could think about extending their rules, winning election by hook or crook and making money from all black and white mean, then they certainly are to be blamed for turning blind eye from terrorists supports, abetters and sympathizers. Even these political parties are to be blamed for housing, nourishing and supporting extremist and terrorists for their invested interests. You, being noteworthy columnist should have taken note of these aspects.
True, good article. The Land of the Pure has gone over, into the abyss.