A democracy without accountability

People of Pakistan should be able to hold their leaders accountable for fulfilling their needs and upholding justice


Anam Khan December 16, 2014

A democracy is basically defined as “a system of government by the whole population or all eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives”. If one glances over the above description, it is fair to say that Pakistan is indeed, a country that follows a democratic form of governance. The general election in May 2013 marked the first time that a democratically elected government was succeeded by another.

In The Journal of Democracy, Thomas Carothers and Sheri Berman claim that countries that are transitioning from dictatorships towards electoral politics are especially prone to civil war, violent revolutions and sectarian bloodshed. However, there are examples of countries that have not faced significant violence in the midst of democratic transitions due to the existence of perquisites that help solidify the road to democratic politics, such as relatively competent and impartial state institutions. Examples of such countries include Brazil and South Korea. This does not mean that Pakistan should shy away from the idea of a democracy. The people must have a voice and embrace the right to choose their representatives. Sometimes there are also situations where mass political pressure on dictators is necessary to drive progress and beneficial change even though certain preconditions for a ‘true democracy’ have not been met. However, keeping all of these possible counterarguments in mind, the people of Pakistan should also be able to hold their leaders accountable for fulfilling their needs and upholding justice.

Let’s consider the attack on the office of the Minhajul Quran on June 17, 2014, in which the government-controlled police in Lahore killed 14 people, including a pregnant woman. This attack was unprovoked. The government initially refused to allow the victims’ families to file a complaint against the prime minister and other officials. Let’s also consider the fact that we live in a country where people are rightfully afraid of addressing several controversial incidents surrounding minorities, religion and sectarian violence because it is difficult to feel safe in a country where certain written views are met with death threats from extremist factions. It has sadly been established that there are ‘certain’ things that we just cannot write about. In this case, the government should feel obligated to make the people of Pakistan feel secure, and it would if it was held accountable for its lack of action. The state of public hospitals is also abhorrent. Patients writhing in agony wait to be treated. The conditions at these hospitals are unsanitary and downright inhuman. Yet, these hospitals continue to function without signs of improvement.

There are hopes that the continuous process of electing and re-electing new leaders will eventually give rise to elected officials who will help Pakistan become a country founded on the principles that Muhammad Ali Jinnah could not implement due to his untimely death. In addition to the electoral process, other legislative procedures need to be simultaneously implemented so that the leaders we elect are fearful of our judgment, especially after they have been elected into office. The use of the police, judiciary and administration for partisan purposes should not be tolerated. Corruption should not be accepted as common practice. Institutions need to be restructured so that government officials foresee the possibility of facing legitimate consequences if they pursue illegal conduct and fail to produce necessary deliverables. Even though the democratic process in the United States indisputably has its flaws, elected presidents still face the threat of impeachment during their term. A military dictatorship is not a preferable alternative. However, sitting idly and allowing the system to cleanse itself through the electoral process could hinder democracy and trigger an irreversible nosedive.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 17th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (5)

Pindi Kid | 9 years ago | Reply

I fail to understand why many writers/journalists keep repeating that the 2013 elections were the first time a democratically elected government was succeeded by another. What about the 2008 elections? Granted the president was Musharraf who held 2 posts. But that had nothing to do with the 2002-2008 parliament and government that was just as equally, if not more, democratically elected. 2008 elections are widely accepted as fair, and all the political parties were allowed to participate, PMLN, PPP, MQM, ANP, JUI etc. all participated in 2002 and 2008 elections. 2002-2008 parliament was also the first to complete its 5 year term.

Parvez | 9 years ago | Reply

Nicely written...........to call what transpires in Pakistan as a democracy is an insult to the very word.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ